Cited by 53Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Inference

Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes, Part II: Proofs of Results

Open access
Orellana, Liliana, Rotnitzky, Andrea, Robins, James M.·2010·The International Journal of Biostatistics

Abstract

In this companion article to "Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes, Part I: Main Content" [Orellana, Rotnitzky and Robins (2010), IJB, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, Art. 7] we present (i) proofs of the claims in that paper, (ii) a proposal for the computation of a confidence set for the optimal index when this lies in a finite set, and (iii) an example to aid the interpretation of the positivity assumption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2202/1557-4679.1242

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orellana, L., Rotnitzky, A., & Robins, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The International Journal of Biostatistics
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
Article 9-Article 9
ISSN
1557-4679 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043184429
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Biostatistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r37ai032475-23)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM048704)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R37-AI032475)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
dynamic treatment regimes, optimal treatment regimes, confidence regions, positivity assumption
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Clinical Trials as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Probability, Research Design, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review