Cited by 298Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions.

Open access
Nahum-Shani, Inbal, Qian, Min, Almirall, Daniel, Pelham, William E., Gnagy, Beth, Fabiano, Gregory A., Waxmonsky, James G., Yu, Jihnhee +1 more·2012·Psychological Methods

Abstract

In recent years, research in the area of intervention development has been shifting from the traditional fixed-intervention approach to adaptive interventions, which allow greater individualization and adaptation of intervention options (i.e., intervention type and/or dosage) over time. Adaptive interventions are operationalized via a sequence of decision rules that specify how intervention options should be adapted to an individual's characteristics and changing needs, with the general aim to optimize the long-term effectiveness of the intervention. Here, we review adaptive interventions, discussing the potential contribution of this concept to research in the behavioral and social sciences. We then propose the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART), an experimental design useful for addressing research questions that inform the construction of high-quality adaptive interventions. To clarify the SMART approach and its advantages, we compare SMART with other experimental approaches. We also provide methods for analyzing data from SMART to address primary research questions that inform the construction of a high-quality adaptive intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029372

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Nahum-Shani I Qian M Pelham WE Gnagy B Fabiano G Waxmonsky J Murphy SA Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions 2010 Manuscript submitted for publication. PMC3825557 23025433
  2. Shani G A training approach to bridge the gap between wizards and macro uses when working with computers (Unpublished masters thesis) 2007 Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion: Israel Institute of Technology
  3. Wu CFJ Hamada M Experiments: Planning, analysis and parameter design optimization 2000 New York, NY Wiley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nahum-Shani, I., Qian, M., Almirall, D., Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, B., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Yu, J., & Murphy, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Florida International University (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
2012-12
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
457-477
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2162512884
Cited by
298
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA010075, DA12414)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA11873)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH069614, MH080015)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R324B060045; LO3000665A)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
adaptive interventions, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, decision rules, intervention dosage, experimental design, data analysis methods, intervention development, social and behavioral sciences
MeSH terms
Behavioral Sciences, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Research Design, Social Sciences, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review