CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 182Statistics Education and MethodologiesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Spread of Evidence-Poor Medicine via Flawed Social-Network Analysis

Open access
Lyons, Russell·2011·Statistics, Politics, and Policy
DOI 10.2202/2151-7509.1024
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The chronic widespread misuse of statistics is usually inadvertent, not intentional. We find cautionary examples in a series of recent papers by Christakis and Fowler that advance statistical arguments for the transmission via social networks of various personal characteristics, including obesity, smoking cessation, happiness, and loneliness. Those papers also assert that such influence extends to three degrees of separation in social networks. We shall show that these conclusions do not follow from Christakis and Fowler's statistical analyses. In fact, their studies even provide some evidence against the existence of such transmission. The errors that we expose arose, in part, because the assumptions behind the statistical procedures used were insufficiently examined, not only by the authors, but also by the reviewers. Our examples are instructive because the practitioners are highly reputed, their results have received enormous popular attention, and the journals that published their studies are among the most respected in the world. An educational bonus emerges from the difficulty we report in getting our critique published. We discuss the relevance of this episode to understanding statistical literacy and the role of scientific review, as well as to reforming statistics education.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2202/2151-7509.1024

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Fidler, 2004, Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals but can t make them think Politics and Policy Iss Art Longitudinal data analysis using general - ized linear models URL http : / / dx doi org biomet, Statistics Biometrika, 24, 73, 10.2202/2151-7509.1024
  2. Stiglitz, 2010, Lessons from the global financial crisis of Seoul, Econ, 23, 321
  3. Baldus, 1990, Positivism s twilight ? Can, J Sociol, 15, 149
  4. Taubes, 1995, Epidemiology faces its limits, Science, 269
  5. Keynes, 1939, Professor Tinbergen s method, J, 49, 558
  6. Keynes, 1940, Comment [ on Tinbergen s reply ], J, 50, 154
  7. Rosenquist, 2010, The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network Ann, Intern Med, 152
  8. Freedman, 2005, Hormone replacement therapy does not save lives : Comments on the Women s Health Initiative, Biometrics, 61
  9. Smith, 1991, Where is the wisdom ? The poverty of medical evidence Brit, Med J, 303

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 182

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lyons, R.
Corresponding author
Lyons, Russell
ORCID
Lyons, Russell
Venue
Statistics, Politics, and Policy
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2011-01-18
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2151-7509 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2202/2151-7509.1024
OpenAlex
W2152314940
Cited by
182
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 16
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistics Politics and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
social network analysis, evidence-based medicine, smoking cessation, happiness, loneliness, statistical methodology critique, statistical literacy, peer review, statistics education, misuse of statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review