Cited by 15Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchUrinary Tract Infections Management

Effectiveness of fluconazole for suppressive maintenance therapy in patients with RVVC: A randomized placebo-controlled study

Bolouri·2010·Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research

Abstract

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) is seen in 5% of women with Candida vaginitis. Use of fluconazole as prophylactic treatment has been suggested for RVVC. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluconazole suppressive therapy in RVVC patients, as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind prophylactic study. Among the 330 women with acute symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis referred to Mirza-kouchak Khan gynecology hospital, 64 eligible subjects with RVVC were enrolled. Then, all of them were treated with fluconazole (150 mg orally every 3 days, for three doses). This was followed by microscopical and clinical examination. Next, patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the fluconazole group (n = 32), patients received fluconazole 150 mg, per week for 6 months and in the control group (n = 32) they received placebo. All the patients were revisited on a monthly basis and at the end of treatment, as well as 3 and 6 months after treatment. At the end of treatment, the frequency of positive culture in fluconazole group was significantly lower than the placebo group (25% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.05). Furthermore, the rate of clinical recurrence was significantly lower in the fluconazole group,with respect to the placebo group (18.8% vs. 50%, P = 0.017). However, following band 6 months after treatment, patients who received fluconazole maintenance therapy had a non-significant differences, compared to the placebo group, based on the rate of clinical recurrence or the frequency of positive cultures. Resistance to fluconazole (MIC ≥ 64) was comparable between groups. Despite the fact that fluconazole is well tolerated by the patients, suppressive treatment with fluconazole in RVVC patients had an insufficient effect on prevention from recurrence of clinical signs and the improvement of vaginal mycological status in long term (3-6 months after treatment).

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.22037/ijpr.2010.827

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolouri
Venue
Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research
Publisher
Shahid Beheshti University
Published
2010-11-20
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
307-313
ISSN
1726-6882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155558210
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, fluconazole, prophylaxis, Candida vaginitis, recurrence prevention, antifungal resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review