Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver

Strauss, Simon, Gavish, Ella, Gottlieb, Paul, Katsnelson, Ludmila·2007·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver variability in the sonographic assessment of the presence and severity of fatty liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the static images of 168 adult patients who had undergone abdominal sonography. Three experienced radiologists independently graded the hepatic images as normal, mild steatosis, moderate steatosis, or severe steatosis. Assessment of liver steatosis was repeated on the same set of images 1 month later under the same conditions and blinded to the initial reading. Weighted kappa statistics were used to analyze interobserver and intraobserver agreement, and the agreement percentages were calculated. RESULTS: The mean interobserver and intraobserver agreement rates for the presence of fatty liver were 72% (kappa = 0.43) and 76% (kappa = 0.54). For severity of fatty liver, the initial reading for pairs of observers had 47-59% (kappa = 0.40-0.51) interobserver agreement. The interobserver agreement for the second reading was 59-64% (kappa = 0.43-0.54). The mean agreement rates for pairs of observers were 53% (kappa = 0.47) and 62% (kappa = 0.50) on the first and second readings. Intraobserver agreement for severity of fatty liver ranged from 55% to 68% (kappa = 0.51-0.63). CONCLUSION: Subjective visual assessment of fatty liver on sonography has substantial observer variability. There is a need for a more objective quantitative method of grading fatty liver on sonography that would be easily available and applicable in routine clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.07.2123

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Strauss, S., Gavish, E., Gottlieb, P., & Katsnelson, L.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2007-12
Volume
189
Issue
6
Pages
W320-W323
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2025204335
Cited by
478
References
2
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.07.2123
The paper
Strauss, S., Gavish, E., Gottlieb, P., & Katsnelson, L. (2007). Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.2123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.