The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver variability in the sonographic assessment of the presence and severity of fatty liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the static images of 168 adult patients who had undergone abdominal sonography. Three experienced radiologists independently graded the hepatic images as normal, mild steatosis, moderate steatosis, or severe steatosis. Assessment of liver steatosis was repeated on the same set of images 1 month later under the same conditions and blinded to the initial reading. Weighted kappa statistics were used to analyze interobserver and intraobserver agreement, and the agreement percentages were calculated. RESULTS: The mean interobserver and intraobserver agreement rates for the presence of fatty liver were 72% (kappa = 0.43) and 76% (kappa = 0.54). For severity of fatty liver, the initial reading for pairs of observers had 47-59% (kappa = 0.40-0.51) interobserver agreement. The interobserver agreement for the second reading was 59-64% (kappa = 0.43-0.54). The mean agreement rates for pairs of observers were 53% (kappa = 0.47) and 62% (kappa = 0.50) on the first and second readings. Intraobserver agreement for severity of fatty liver ranged from 55% to 68% (kappa = 0.51-0.63). CONCLUSION: Subjective visual assessment of fatty liver on sonography has substantial observer variability. There is a need for a more objective quantitative method of grading fatty liver on sonography that would be easily available and applicable in routine clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Angulo, P. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra011775 · Cited by 5,228
Cited by
Thoma, C., Day, C. P., & Trenell, M. I. (2012) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.06.010 · Cited by 523
Sberna, A. L., Bouillet, B., Rouland, A., Brindisi, M. C., Nguyen, A., Mouillot, T., Duvillard, L., Denimal, D., Loffroy, R., Vergès, B., et al. (2018) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13565 · Cited by 322
Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Invasive versus Noninvasive
Wieckowska, A., & Feldstein, A. (2008) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/s-0028-1091983 · Cited by 300
Webb, M., Yeshua, H., Zelber-Sagi, S., Santo, E., Brazowski, E., Halpern, Z., & Oren, R. (2009) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.07.4016 · Cited by 285
Pirmoazen, A. M., Khurana, A., El Kaffas, A., & Kamaya, A. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.40249 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Strauss, S., Gavish, E., Gottlieb, P., & Katsnelson, L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- W320-W323
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2025204335
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.07.2123
- The paper
- Strauss, S., Gavish, E., Gottlieb, P., & Katsnelson, L. (2007). Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.2123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.