The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Value of a Computerized Hepatorenal Index for Sonographic Quantification of Liver Steatosis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Quantification of liver steatosis is clinically relevant in various liver diseases but cannot be done by conventional sonography, which only provides a qualitative assessment with significant observer variability. The aim of this study was to assess sonography as an objective tool for the quantification of liver steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Files of 111 patients with chronic liver disease who were referred for sonographically guided liver biopsy were collected. A hepatorenal sonographic index was calculated on the basis of the ratio between the echogenicity of the liver and that of the right kidney cortex using histogram echo intensity. Liver steatosis was graded by histology. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between histologic steatosis and the hepatorenal sonographic index (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). The validity of the hepatorenal sonographic index for the diagnosis of fatty liver was compared with liver biopsies with a steatosis level > 5%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 99.2% (95% CI, 98-100%). The optimal hepatorenal sonographic index cutoff point for the prediction of steatosis > 5% was 1.49, with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91%. The optimal hepatorenal sonographic index cutoff point for the prediction of steatosis >/= 25% was 1.86, with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90%. The optimal hepatorenal sonographic index cutoff point for the prediction of steatosis >/= 60% was 2.23, with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 93%. CONCLUSION: The hepatorenal sonographic index is a sensitive noninvasive method for steatosis quantification. It can diagnose small amounts of liver fat that would be missed by conventional sonography. It is reproducible and operator independent and can serve as an efficient tool to follow patients with steatosis and evaluate the efficacy of new treatment techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Angulo, P. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra011775 · Cited by 5,228
Steatohepatitis: A tale of two “hits”?
Day, C. P., & James, O. F. W. (1998) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70599-2 · Cited by 4,285
The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Saadeh, S., Younossi, Z. M., Remer, E. M., Gramlich, T., Ong, J. P., Hurley, M., Mullen, K. D., Cooper, J. N., & Sheridan, M. J. (2002) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2002.35354 · Cited by 2,110
Sampling Variability of Liver Biopsy in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Ratziu, V., Charlotte, F., Heurtier, A., Gombert, S., Giral, P., Bruckert, E., Grimaldi, A., Capron, F., & Poynard, T. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084 · Cited by 2,106
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Adams, L. A. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.045232 · Cited by 1,610
An Update on Terminology and Reporting
Batts, K. P., & Ludwig, J. (1995) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199512000-00007 · Cited by 1,080
Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Definition and Pathology
Brunt, E. M. (2001) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/s-2001-12925 · Cited by 911
Ultrasound scanning in the detection of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis.
Saverymuttu, S. H., Joseph, A. E., & Maxwell, J. D. (1986) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.292.6512.13 · Cited by 853
Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
ANGULO, P., & LINDOR, K. D. (2002) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.10.x · Cited by 835
Bohte, A. E., van Werven, J. R., Bipat, S., & Stoker, J. (2011) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1905-5 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Zelber-Sagi, S., Ivancovsky-Wajcman, D., Fliss Isakov, N., Webb, M., Orenstein, D., Shibolet, O., & Kariv, R. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.015 · Cited by 297
Self-citationDamms-Machado, A., Louis, S., Schnitzer, A., Volynets, V., Rings, A., Basrai, M., & Bischoff, S. C. (2017) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.116.131110 · Cited by 195
Pirmoazen, A. M., Khurana, A., El Kaffas, A., & Kamaya, A. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.40249 · Cited by 165
Effect of resistance training on non-alcoholic fatty-liver disease a randomized-clinical trial
Zelber-Sagi, S. (2014) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4382 · Cited by 152
Self-citationBarrea, L., Tarantino, G., Somma, C. D., Muscogiuri, G., Macchia, P. E., Falco, A., Colao, A., & Savastano, S. (2017) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2017/6101254 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, M., Yeshua, H., Zelber-Sagi, S., Santo, E., Brazowski, E., Halpern, Z., & Oren, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 909-914
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2155664277
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Value of a Computerized Hepatorenal Index for Sonographic Quantification of Liver Steatosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.07.4016
- The paper
- Webb, M., Yeshua, H., Zelber-Sagi, S., Santo, E., Brazowski, E., Halpern, Z., & Oren, R. (2009). Diagnostic Value of a Computerized Hepatorenal Index for Sonographic Quantification of Liver Steatosis. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.4016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.