The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation.
Abstract
The accuracy of measurements of flow velocity determined by using cine MR phase velocity mapping--velocity-encoded cine (VEC) MR--was assessed by comparing VEC MR data with independent measurements in a flow phantom and in human subjects. Constant flow velocities generated in a phantom (range, 20-408 cm/sec) were determined correctly by VEC MR (r = .997, standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 7.9 cm/sec). Peak systolic velocities in the main pulmonary artery determined by VEC MR correlated well with the measurements obtained by using continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography (r = .91). Stroke volumes measured at the aorta by VEC MR and continuous-wave Doppler imaging also correlated well with each other (r = .80). VEC MR measurements of aortic and pulmonary flow provided left and right ventricular stroke volumes that correlated well with left ventricular stroke volumes determined by short-axis cine MR images (r = .98, SEE = 3.7 ml, and r = .95, SEE = 4.8 ml, respectively). Intra- and interobserver variabilities were small for both left and right ventricular stroke volumes as measured with VEC MR. These results indicate that VEC MR accurately and reproducibly measures aortic and pulmonary flow velocities and volumes in the physiologic range of humans, and can be used to measure right and left ventricular stroke volumes under normal flow conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
Cardiovascular Flow Measurement with Phase-Contrast MR Imaging: Basic Facts and Implementation
Lotz, J., Meier, C., Leppert, A., & Galanski, M. (2002) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma11651 · Cited by 673
Three-dimensional modeling for functional analysis of cardiac images, a review
Frangi, A. F., Niessen, W. J., & Viergever, M. A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.906421 · Cited by 533
Clinical Indications for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel Report #
Pennell, D., Sechtem, U., Higgins, C., Manning, W., Pohost, G., Rademakers, F., van Rossum, A., Shaw, L., & Kent Yucel, E. (2004) · Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1081/jcmr-200038581 · Cited by 274
Self-citationCardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Valvular Heart Disease: Technique and Validation
Cawley, P. J., Maki, J. H., & Otto, C. M. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.742486 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Kondo, C., Caputo, G. R., Semelka, R., Foster, E., Shimakawa, A., & Higgins, C. B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-16
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1979097847
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.157.1.2048544
- The paper
- Kondo, C., Caputo, G. R., Semelka, R., Foster, E., Shimakawa, A., & Higgins, C. B. (1991). Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.157.1.2048544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.