The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous catheter drainage for initial treatment of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis shown with contrast-enhanced CT were treated for sepsis with percutaneous catheter drainage. Extent of necrosis was less than 30% in 10 cases, 30-50% in 10 cases, and greater than 50% in 14 cases. Fourteen patients had central necrosis. Eighteen patients were critically ill with multiorgan failure. RESULTS: Sixteen (47%) of the 34 patients were cured with only percutaneous catheter drainage, including four (29%) of the 14 patients with central gland necrosis and 12 (60%) of the 20 with body-tail necrosis. Sepsis was controlled (defervescence of fever and return of WBC to normal) in an additional nine patients, allowing elective pancreatic surgery for control of pancreatic duct fistula. Eight patients failed to show clinical improvement after drainage and required necrosectomy. No patient experienced catheter-related complications. Mortality was 12% (all four deaths occurred after necrosectomy because of multiorgan failure). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is a safe and effective technique for treating infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Overall, sepsis was controlled in 74% of patients, permitting elective surgery for treatment of pancreatic fistula, and 47% of patients were cured with no surgery required. No catheter-related complications occurred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis
Banks, P. A., Freeman, M. L., & the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x · Cited by 2,050
Cited by
Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis
Banks, P. A., Freeman, M. L., & the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x · Cited by 2,050
UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis
(2005) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2004.057026 · Cited by 940
IAP Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Acute Pancreatitis
Uhl, W. H., Warshaw, A. L., IMRIE, C. W., Bassi, C., McKay, C. J., Lankisch, P. G., Carter, R., Magno, E. D., Banks, P. A., Whitcomb, D. C., et al. (2002) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1159/000071269 · Cited by 773
Thoeni, R. F. (2012) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11110947 · Cited by 470
Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Baron, T. H., & Morgan, D. E. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199905063401807 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeny, P. C., Hauptmann, E., Althaus, S. J., Traverso, L. W., & Sinanan, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 969-975
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2054934999
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530046
- The paper
- Freeny, P. C., Hauptmann, E., Althaus, S. J., Traverso, L. W., & Sinanan, M. (1998). Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.