The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the abdominal organs and liver lesions, to determine the effect of the magnitude of b values on the ADCs, and to determine whether measured ADCs of liver tumors help differentiate benign from malignant lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six healthy volunteers and 126 patients were examined with diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging using multiple b values (maximum, 846 sec/mm2). The ADCs of the liver, spleen, kidney, 49 malignant liver lesions (33 hepatocellular carcinomas, 15 metastatic liver tumors, and one cholangiocellular carcinoma), and 30 benign lesions (17 cysts, 12 hemangiomas, and one angiomyolipoma) were calculated. RESULTS: The ADCs of the abdominal organs and liver lesions showed smaller values when calculated with the greater maximum b values. The ADCs of the benign lesions calculated with all the b values of less than 850 sec/mm2 (2.49+/-1.39 x 10(-3) mm2/sec) were significantly (p = .0024) greater than those of the malignant lesions (1.01+/-0.38 x 10(-3) mm2/sec). When the maximum b value is 846 sec/mm2, use of a threshold ADC of 1.6 x 10(-3) mm2/sec would result in a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 80% for differentiation of malignant liver lesions from benign lesions. CONCLUSION: Measurement of ADC has good potential for characterizing liver lesions, but the calculated ADCs could be affected by the magnitude of the maximum b value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1986) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 · Cited by 3,912
Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion.
Turner, R., Le Bihan, D., Maier, J., Vavrek, R., Hedges, L. K., & Pekar, J. (1990) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217777 · Cited by 581
Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Bihan, D. L. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 438
Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging.
Namimoto, T., Yamashita, Y., Sumi, S., Tang, Y., & Takahashi, M. (1997) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.204.3.9280252 · Cited by 349
Ichikawa, T., Haradome, H., Hachiya, J., Nitatori, T., & Araki, T. (1998) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456953 · Cited by 314
Accuracy of radiology in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation
Rizzi, P. M., Kane, P. A., Ryder, S., et al. (1994) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(94)90545-2 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Parikh, T., Drew, S. J., Lee, V. S., Wong, S., Hecht, E. M., Babb, J. S., & Taouli, B. (2008) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070432 · Cited by 560
Patel, J., Sigmund, E. E., Rusinek, H., Oei, M., Babb, J. S., & Taouli, B. (2010) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.22081 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, T., Murakami, T., Takahashi, S., Hori, M., Tsuda, K., & Nakamura, H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 393-398
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1966998025
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430143
- The paper
- Kim, T., Murakami, T., Takahashi, S., Hori, M., Tsuda, K., & Nakamura, H. (1999). Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.