The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echoplanar imaging in characterizing focal hepatic lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging on a 1.5-T MR unit was performed in 46 patients with 74 known focal hepatic lesions (11 hemangiomas, 15 metastases, and 48 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs]). Mean values for ADCs and CNRs of all lesions were calculated. Mean values for CNRs with diffusion-weighted imaging were also compared with those for breath-hold T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. RESULTS: The mean values for ADCs were different for each type of tumor (5.39 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 1.23 in hemangiomas, 2.85 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 0.59 in metastases, and 3.84 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 0.92 in HCCs), and each of them was significantly greater than the mean values for ADCs of the normal liver (2.28 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 1.23 in normal liver [p < .05] except metastasis versus normal liver [p < .1]). Also, the mean values for ADCs were based on differences of ADC values. Only four (6%) of 63 malignant tumors (three HCCs and one metastasis) could not be differentiated from hemangiomas. The mean value for CNRs with diffusion-weighted images (14.4 +/- 8.54 in HCC and 29.0 +/- 6.79 in metastasis) was significantly higher than the mean values for CNRs obtained with T2-weighted fast spin-echo images in both metastases and HCCs (p < .05), whereas no significant difference was seen for hemangiomas. CONCLUSION: Mean values for ADCs differed for the three types of the hepatic lesions and were higher than ADCs of the normal liver. We suggest that diffusion-weighted imaging may be useful for increased detection of HCCs and metastases and in distinguishing these entities from hemangiomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications
Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J., Poupon, C., Clark, C. A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., & Chabriat, H. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1076 · Cited by 3,547
Parikh, T., Drew, S. J., Lee, V. S., Wong, S., Hecht, E. M., Babb, J. S., & Taouli, B. (2008) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070432 · Cited by 560
Patel, J., Sigmund, E. E., Rusinek, H., Oei, M., Babb, J. S., & Taouli, B. (2010) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.22081 · Cited by 371
Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease.
Kim, T., Murakami, T., Takahashi, S., Hori, M., Tsuda, K., & Nakamura, H. (1999) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430143 · Cited by 349
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Erickson, S. K. (2009) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r800089-jlr200 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Ichikawa, T., Haradome, H., Hachiya, J., Nitatori, T., & Araki, T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-402
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2033412857
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456953
- The paper
- Ichikawa, T., Haradome, H., Hachiya, J., Nitatori, T., & Araki, T. (1998). Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.