Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions.

Ichikawa, T, Haradome, H, Hachiya, J, Nitatori, T, Araki, T·1998·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echoplanar imaging in characterizing focal hepatic lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging on a 1.5-T MR unit was performed in 46 patients with 74 known focal hepatic lesions (11 hemangiomas, 15 metastases, and 48 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs]). Mean values for ADCs and CNRs of all lesions were calculated. Mean values for CNRs with diffusion-weighted imaging were also compared with those for breath-hold T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. RESULTS: The mean values for ADCs were different for each type of tumor (5.39 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 1.23 in hemangiomas, 2.85 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 0.59 in metastases, and 3.84 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 0.92 in HCCs), and each of them was significantly greater than the mean values for ADCs of the normal liver (2.28 x 10(-3) mm2/sec +/- 1.23 in normal liver [p < .05] except metastasis versus normal liver [p < .1]). Also, the mean values for ADCs were based on differences of ADC values. Only four (6%) of 63 malignant tumors (three HCCs and one metastasis) could not be differentiated from hemangiomas. The mean value for CNRs with diffusion-weighted images (14.4 +/- 8.54 in HCC and 29.0 +/- 6.79 in metastasis) was significantly higher than the mean values for CNRs obtained with T2-weighted fast spin-echo images in both metastases and HCCs (p < .05), whereas no significant difference was seen for hemangiomas. CONCLUSION: Mean values for ADCs differed for the three types of the hepatic lesions and were higher than ADCs of the normal liver. We suggest that diffusion-weighted imaging may be useful for increased detection of HCCs and metastases and in distinguishing these entities from hemangiomas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456953

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Ichikawa, T., Haradome, H., Hachiya, J., Nitatori, T., & Araki, T.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1998-02
Volume
170
Issue
2
Pages
397-402
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2033412857
Cited by
314
References
0
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456953
The paper
Ichikawa, T., Haradome, H., Hachiya, J., Nitatori, T., & Araki, T. (1998). Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456953

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.