CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareDialysis and Renal Disease Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nephrologists’ Reported Preparedness for End-of-Life Decision-Making

Davison, Sara N., Jhangri, Gian S., Holley, Jean L., Moss, Alvin H.·2006·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
DOI 10.2215/cjn.02040606
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Nephrologists commonly engage in end-of-life decision-making with patients with ESRD and their families. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceived preparedness of nephrologists to make end-of-life decisions and to determine factors that are associated with the highest level of perceived preparedness. The nephrologist members of the Renal Physicians Association (RPA) and the Canadian Society of Nephrology were invited to participate in an online survey of their end-of-life decision-making practices. A total of 39% of 360 respondents perceived themselves as very well prepared to make end-of-life decisions. Age >46 yr, six or more patients withdrawn from dialysis in the preceding year, and awareness of the RPA/American Society of Nephrology (ASN) guideline on dialysis decision-making were independently associated with the highest level of self-reported preparedness. Nephrologists who reported being very well prepared were more likely to use time-limited trials of dialysis and stop dialysis of a patient with permanent and severe dementia. Compared with Americans, Canadian nephrologists reported being equally prepared to make end-of-life decisions, stopped dialysis of a higher number of patients, referred fewer to hospice, and were more likely to stop dialysis of a patient with severe dementia. Nephrologists who have been in practice longer and are knowledgeable of the RPA/ASN guideline report greater preparedness to make end-of-life decisions and report doing so more often in accordance with guideline recommendations. To improve nephrologists' comfort with end-of-life decision-making, fellowship programs should teach the recommendations in the RPA/ASN guideline and position statement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.02040606

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–153 of 153

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Davison, S. N., Jhangri, G. S., Holley, J. L., & Moss, A. H.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Davison, Sara N.
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2006-11
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
1256-1262
ISSN
1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2215/cjn.02040606
OpenAlex
W2083351167
Cited by
154
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
end-of-life decisions, nephrologists, end-stage renal disease, dialysis withdrawal, physician preparedness, advanced dementia, hospice referral
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Canada, Decision Making, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Middle Aged, Nephrology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Societies, Medical, Terminal Care, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review