Cited by 5Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsDialysis and Renal Disease Management

Race-Based eGFR Assessment for Kidney Transplantation

Open access
Hoenig, Melanie P., Pavlakis, Martha·2021·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

The search for a reliable strategy to easily measure kidney function has been likened to the search for the holy grail in nephrology because the interpretation of the measured blood creatinine requires an understanding of the nonlinear and reciprocal relationship between renal function and

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.11020821

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Race corrections in clinical algorithms often have the effect of requiring patients of color to be sicker before they qualify for the same level of care as a White patient.

    “Such “corrections” are used in a variety of areas of medicine, from endocrinology and nephrology to oncology and obstetrics, which often have the effect of requiring patients of color to be sicker before they qualify for the same level of care as a White patient.24–26”

    From Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

    The passage on UNOS waiting-time reinstatement (section and page unavailable) describes a Black transplant recipient who, at the same creatinine level as another recipient, would not regain waiting time. This supports the claim for a kidney-transplant eligibility decision, but the paper does not establish the broader claim across the other areas of medicine named in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoenig, M. P., & Pavlakis, M.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2021-10
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1464-1466
ISSN
  • 1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-905X
OpenAlex
W3201729890
Cited by
5
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
estimated glomerular filtration rate, kidney transplantation, renal function assessment, creatinine
MeSH terms
Creatinine, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review