Cited by 19DNA Repair MechanismsGenetic factors in colorectal cancerCancer therapeutics and mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA Repair Capacity and Response to Treatment of Colon Cancer

Vodicka, Pavel, Vodenkova, Sona, Buchler, Tomas, Vodickova, Ludmila·2019·Pharmacogenomics

Abstract

DNA repair, a complex biological process, ensures genomic integrity. Alterations in DNA repair, occurring in many cancers, contribute to the accumulation of mutations in the genome, resulting in genomic instability and cancer progression. DNA repair also plays a substantial role in response to chemotherapeutics: rapidly dividing colon cancer cells, vulnerable to DNA-damaging agents and overcoming DNA repair, undergo cell death. DNA repair capacity represents a complex biomarker, integrating gene variants, gene expressions, the stability of gene products, the effect of inhibitors/stimulators, lifestyle and environmental factors. Here, we discuss DNA repair capacity in sporadic colon cancer, a frequent malignancy worldwide, in relation to tumor heterogeneity, prognosis and prediction, measurements in surrogate and target tissues and suggest important tasks to be addressed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/pgs-2019-0070

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.3322/caac.21492 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0031 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.001 · DOI
  4. Uk CR . Cancer Research UK. Bowel Cancer Incidence Statistics (2015). www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bowel-cancer/incidence
  5. 10.1056/NEJMsr1714643 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02549.x · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature11252 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nm.3967 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/annonc/mdt354 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nrc1074 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.08.006 · DOI
  12. 10.1266/ggs.15-00023 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.010 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/1758834015614530 · DOI
  15. 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/annonc/mdy085 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/annonc/mdy410 · DOI
  18. 10.18632/oncotarget.24617 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1401182111 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/cas.12366 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nrc3399 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/nrc.2015.2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0247 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.040 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s12885-016-2826-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00018-008-8557-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/ncomms3674 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.18632/oncotarget.14909 · DOI
  31. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.003 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s11864-015-0348-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/annonc/mdx030 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.026 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.0438031100 · DOI
  36. 10.2217/pgs-2015-0017 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/mc.22141 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/mutage/ger070 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.009 · DOI
  40. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1151 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.04.007 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkz171 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/em.20650 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.09.006 · DOI
  45. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3268 · DOI
  46. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1380 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.10.013 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.04.002 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/mutage/ges021 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.07.003 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.01.016 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.03.005 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/em.20055 · DOI
  54. 10.1289/ehp.6849 · DOI
  55. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0314 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.clon.2019.02.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Vodicka, P., Vodenkova, S., Buchler, T., & Vodickova, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University & Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Venue
Pharmacogenomics
Published
2019-11
Volume
20
Issue
17
Pages
1225-1233
ISSN
  • 1462-2416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8042
OpenAlex
W2983799111
Cited by
19
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacogenomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GACR (18-09709S)
  • Algemene Ziektekosten Verzekerin (15-27580A, NV18-00199)
  • Charles University Research Centre program (UNCE/MED/006)
  • Charles University Research (Q39, Q28)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Keywords
DNA repair capacity, colon cancer, chemosensitivity, genomic instability, tumor heterogeneity, prognostic factors, predictive biomarkers, DNA-damaging agents, surrogate tissue, tumor-infiltrating immune cells
MeSH terms
Colonic Neoplasms, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Mutation, Prognosis, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Cell Death, Genomic Instability, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review