The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells
Open accessAbstract
Embryonic stem cells (ESC) are both a potential source of cells for tissue replacement therapies and an accessible tool to model early embryonic development. Chemical factors such as soluble growth factors and insoluble components of the extracellular matrix are known to affect the differentiation of murine ESCs. However, there is also evidence to suggest that undifferentiated cells can both sense the mechanical properties of their environment and differentiate accordingly. By growing ESCs on flexible polydimethylsiloxane substrates with varying stiffness, we tested the hypothesis that substrate stiffness can influence ESC differentiation. While cell attachment was unaffected by the stiffness of the growth substrate, cell spreading and cell growth were all increased as a function of substrate stiffness. Similarly, several genes expressed in the primitive streak during gastrulation and implicated in early mesendoderm differentiation, such as Brachyury, Mixl1 and Eomes, were upregulated in cell cultures on stiffer compared to softer substrates. Finally, we demonstrated that osteogenic differentiation of ESCs was enhanced on stiff substrates compared to soft substrates, illustrating that the mechanical environment can play a role in both early and terminal ESC differentiation. Our results suggest a fundamental role for mechanosensing in mammalian development and illustrate that the mechanical environment should be taken into consideration when engineering implantable scaffolds or when producing therapeutically relevant cell populations in vitro.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 · Cited by 13,915
Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos
Evans, M. J., & Kaufman, M. H. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/292154a0 · Cited by 8,607
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Martin, G. R. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634 · Cited by 5,746
Cell Shape, Cytoskeletal Tension, and RhoA Regulate Stem Cell Lineage Commitment
McBeath, R., Pirone, D. M., Nelson, C. M., Bhadriraju, K., & Chen, C. S. (2004) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(04)00075-9 · Cited by 4,180
Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility
Pelham, R. J., & Wang, Y.-L. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13661 · Cited by 3,027
Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface
Stevens, M. M., & George, J. H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106587 · Cited by 2,607
Self-citationRole of cell shape in growth control
Folkman, J., & Moscona, A. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/273345a0 · Cited by 2,422
Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion
Yeung, T., Georges, P. C., Flanagan, L. A., Marg, B., Ortiz, M., Funaki, M., Zahir, N., Ming, W., Weaver, V., & Janmey, P. A. (2005) · Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · doi:10.1002/cm.20041 · Cited by 2,325
Cited by
Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues
Dvir, T., Timko, B. P., Kohane, D. S., & Langer, R. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.246 · Cited by 1,367
Role of the extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate
Watt, F. M., & Huck, W. T. S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3620 · Cited by 861
Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy
Haase, K., & Pelling, A. E. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0970 · Cited by 396
Multi-component extracellular matrices based on peptide self-assembly
Collier, J. H., Rudra, J. S., Gasiorowski, J. Z., & Jung, J. P. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b914337h · Cited by 229
Understanding the extracellular forces that determine cell fate and maintenance
Kumar, A., Placone, J. K., & Engler, A. J. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.158469 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Dept Materials, R. S. O. M., Evans, N., Minelli, C., Gentleman, E., LaPointe, V, Patankar, S., Kallivretaki, M., Chen, X., Roberts, C., & Stevens, M.
- Venue
- European Cells and Materials
- Publisher
- Forum Multimedia Publishing LLC
- Published
- 2009-09-21
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1473-2262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169755701
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22203/ecm.v018a01
- The paper
- Dept Materials, R. S. O. M., Evans, N., Minelli, C., Gentleman, E., LaPointe, V, Patankar, S., Kallivretaki, M., Chen, X., Roberts, C., & Stevens, M. (2009). Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. European Cells and Materials. https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v018a01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.