Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells

Open access
Dept Materials, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, U.K., Evans, ND, Minelli, C, Gentleman, E, LaPointe, V, Patankar, SN, Kallivretaki, M, Chen, X, Roberts, CJ, Stevens, MM·2009·European Cells and Materials

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells (ESC) are both a potential source of cells for tissue replacement therapies and an accessible tool to model early embryonic development. Chemical factors such as soluble growth factors and insoluble components of the extracellular matrix are known to affect the differentiation of murine ESCs. However, there is also evidence to suggest that undifferentiated cells can both sense the mechanical properties of their environment and differentiate accordingly. By growing ESCs on flexible polydimethylsiloxane substrates with varying stiffness, we tested the hypothesis that substrate stiffness can influence ESC differentiation. While cell attachment was unaffected by the stiffness of the growth substrate, cell spreading and cell growth were all increased as a function of substrate stiffness. Similarly, several genes expressed in the primitive streak during gastrulation and implicated in early mesendoderm differentiation, such as Brachyury, Mixl1 and Eomes, were upregulated in cell cultures on stiffer compared to softer substrates. Finally, we demonstrated that osteogenic differentiation of ESCs was enhanced on stiff substrates compared to soft substrates, illustrating that the mechanical environment can play a role in both early and terminal ESC differentiation. Our results suggest a fundamental role for mechanosensing in mammalian development and illustrate that the mechanical environment should be taken into consideration when engineering implantable scaffolds or when producing therapeutically relevant cell populations in vitro.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22203/ecm.v018a01

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Dept Materials, R. S. O. M., Evans, N., Minelli, C., Gentleman, E., LaPointe, V, Patankar, S., Kallivretaki, M., Chen, X., Roberts, C., & Stevens, M.
Venue
European Cells and Materials
Published
2009-09-21
Volume
18
Pages
1-14
ISSN
1473-2262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169755701
Cited by
466
References
55
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22203/ecm.v018a01
The paper
Dept Materials, R. S. O. M., Evans, N., Minelli, C., Gentleman, E., LaPointe, V, Patankar, S., Kallivretaki, M., Chen, X., Roberts, C., & Stevens, M. (2009). Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. European Cells and Materials. https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v018a01

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.