Cited by 444Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Outcomes and InfluencesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

SELF-EFFICACY, SELF-ESTEEM AND THEIR IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

Open access
Lane, John, Lane, Andrew M., Kyprianou, Anna·2004·Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal

Abstract

This study investigated relationships between self-efficacy, self-esteem, previous performance accomplishments, and academic performance among a sample of 205 postgraduate students. Participants completed measures of past performance accomplishments, self-esteem, and self-efficacy at the start of a 15-week course. Each student's average grade from modules studied was used as the performance measure. Correlation results indicated significant relationships between self-efficacy and self-esteem. Multiple regression results indicated that self-efficacy mediated the relationship between performance accomplishments and academic performance. Findings lend support to the predictive effectiveness of self-efficacy measures in academic settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2224/sbp.2004.32.3.247

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-esteem was not significantly associated with academic performance.

    “On the other hand, self-esteem was not significantly associated with academic performance, which differed from previous studies (Lane et al., 2004; Lent et al., 1986; Raskauskas et al., 2015).”

    From Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention (2019) · cites this paper as Lane et al., 2004

  • Self-esteem is positively associated with academic performance.

    “Self-esteem has also been shown to be positively associated with academic performance (e.g., Lane, Lane, & Kyprianou, 2004; Lent, Brown, & Larkin, 1986) and further serve as a protective factor against adversities in aiding academic and emotional resilience (Raskauskas, Rubiano, Offen, & Wayland, 2015).”

    From Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention (2019) · cites this paper as Lane, Lane, & Kyprianou, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lane, J., Lane, A. M., & Kyprianou, A.
Venue
Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
247-256
ISSN
0301-2212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042139231
Cited by
444
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
self-efficacy, self-esteem, academic performance, graduate students, mediation, student performance prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review