Cited by 176Digital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingArtificial Intelligence in Education

Optimizing Students’ Mental Health and Academic Performance: AI-Enhanced Life Crafting

Open access
Dekker, Izaak, De Jong, Elisabeth M., Schippers, Michaéla C., De Bruijn-Smolders, Monique, Alexiou, Andreas, Giesbers, Bas·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

One in three university students experiences mental health problems during their study. A similar percentage leaves higher education without obtaining the degree for which they enrolled. Research suggests that both mental health problems and academic underperformance could be caused by students lacking control and purpose while they are adjusting to tertiary education. Currently, universities are not designed to cater to all the personal needs and mental health problems of large numbers of students at the start of their studies. Within the literature aimed at preventing mental health problems among students (e.g., anxiety or depression), digital forms of therapy recently have been suggested as potentially scalable solutions to address these problems. Integrative psychological artificial intelligence (AI) in the form of a chatbot, for example, shows great potential as an evidence-based solution. At the same time, within the literature aimed at improving academic performance, the online life-crafting intervention in which students write about values and passions, goals, and goal-attainment plans has shown to improve the academic performance and retention rates of students. Because the life-crafting intervention is delivered through the curriculum and doesn't bear the stigma that is associated with therapy, it can reach larger populations of students. But life-crafting lacks the means for follow-up or the interactiveness that online AI-guided therapy can offer. In this narrative review, we propose to integrate the current literature on chatbot interventions aimed at the mental health of students with research about a life-crafting intervention that uses an inclusive curriculum-wide approach. When a chatbot asks students to prioritize both academic as well as social and health-related goals and provides personalized follow-up coaching, this can prevent -often interrelated- academic and mental health problems. Right on-time delivery, and personalized follow-up questions enhance the effects of both -originally separated- intervention types. Research on this new combination of interventions should use design principles that increase user-friendliness and monitor the technology acceptance of its participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01063

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hattie J. A. C. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analysis Relating to Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
  2. Oettingen G. Sevincer A. T. (2018). “ Fantasy about the future as friend and foe,” in The psychology of thinking about the future, eds Oettingen G. Sevincer A. T. Gollwitzer P. M. (New York, NY: The Guilford Press), 127– 149.
  3. Perry R. P. (1991). “ Perceived control in college students: implications for instruction in higher education,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 7 ed. Smart J. (New York, NY: Agathon Press), 1– 56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dekker, I., De Jong, E. M., Schippers, M. C., De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Alexiou, A., & Giesbers, B.
Affiliations
  • Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Dekker, Izaak
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
11
Pages
1063-1063
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033432616
Cited by
176
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (405.19865.495)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
student mental health, academic performance, chatbots, digital mental health interventions, student retention, personalized coaching, university students, technology acceptance, ease of use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review