The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biotechnological processes for chitin recovery out of crustacean waste: A mini-review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Chitin is an important natural resource. The annual worldwide production is estimated in approximately 10 10 -10 12 ton. It is produced by arthropods (insects and crustaceans), molluscs and fungi. Its main biological function is structural. Crustacean shells are the most important chitin source for commercial use due to its high content and ready availability. Chitin and its derivatives have great economical value because of their numerous applications: food, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, textile industries, waste water treatment and agriculture. In nature, chitin is closely associated with proteins, minerals, lipid and pigments, which have to be removed. Results: Several techniques to extract chitin from different sources have been reported. The most common method for recovery of chitin from crustacean shells is the chemical procedure. It involves two mayor steps: elimination of inorganic matter (demineralization) and extraction of protein matter (deproteination) using strong acids and bases. However, these processes may cause depolymerization affecting the polymer properties such as molecular weight, viscosity and degree of acetylation. In addition, the chemical purification of chitin is hazardous, energy consuming and threatening to the environment. As an alternative to the chemical process, different biological processes have been investigated: microbiological fermentation and methodologies using enzymatic crude extracts or isolated enzymes. Conclusions: The results reported are extremely variable; however, they offer new perspectives for the production of chitin with the concomitant reduction of the environmental impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
El Hadrami, A., Adam, L. R., El Hadrami, I., & Daayf, F. (2010) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md8040968 · Cited by 783
Cited by
Seafood waste: a source for preparation of commercially employable chitin/chitosan materials
Yadav, M., Goswami, P., Paritosh, K., Kumar, M., Pareek, N., & Vivekanand, V. (2019) · Bioresources and Bioprocessing · doi:10.1186/s40643-019-0243-y · Cited by 515
Current state of chitin purification and chitosan production from insects
Hahn, T., Tafi, E., Paul, A., Salvia, R., Falabella, P., & Zibek, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.6533 · Cited by 373
Gedda, G., Lee, C.-Y., Lin, Y.-C., & Wu, H.-F. (2016) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.09.065 · Cited by 358
Mohan, K., Ganesan, A. R., Muralisankar, T., Jayakumar, R., Sathishkumar, P., Uthayakumar, V., Chandirasekar, R., & Revathi, N. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.016 · Cited by 355
Caligiani, A., Marseglia, A., Leni, G., Baldassarre, S., Maistrello, L., Dossena, A., & Sforza, S. (2018) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.012 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Hours, R. A., & Gortari, M. C.
- Venue
- Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0717-3458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992070341
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biotechnological processes for chitin recovery out of crustacean waste: A mini-review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2225/vol16-issue3-fulltext-10
- The paper
- Hours, R. A., & Gortari, M. C. (2013). Biotechnological processes for chitin recovery out of crustacean waste: A mini-review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol16-issue3-fulltext-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.