Cited by 19Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

QED driven QAOA for network-flow optimization

Open access
Zhang, Yuxuan, Zhang, Ruizhe, Potter, Andrew C.·2021·Quantum

Abstract

We present a general framework for modifying quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOA) to solve constrained network flow problems. By exploiting an analogy between flow-constraints and Gauss' law for electromagnetism, we design lattice quantum electrodynamics (QED)- inspired mixing Hamiltonians that preserve flow constraints throughout the QAOA process. This results in an exponential reduction in the size of the configuration space that needs to be explored, which we show through numerical simulations, yields higher quality approximate solutions compared to the original QAOA routine. We outline a specific implementation for edge-disjoint path (EDP) problems related to traffic congestion minimization, numerically analyze the effect of initial state choice, and explore trade-offs between circuit complexity and qubit resources via a particle-vortex duality mapping. Comparing the effect of initial states reveals that starting with an ergodic (unbiased) superposition of solutions yields better performance than beginning with the mixer ground-state, suggesting a departure from the ``short-cut to adiabaticity" mechanism often used to motivate QAOA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22331/q-2021-07-27-510

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several other approaches have been identified where ansatz adaptations happen as a secondary effect.

    “Several other approaches have been identified where the ansatz adaptations happen as a secondary effect, e.g., References [36, 48, 82, 131, 153].”
  • Zhang et al. proposed an approach for network flow optimization problems similar to the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz but inspired by quantum electrodynamics.

    “An approach for network flow optimization problems like, e.g., routing problems, which is similar to the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz but inspired by quantum electrodynamics, has been proposed by Zhang et al. [153].”
  • Zhang et al. also provide an advanced, restricted version of their method that additionally avoids physically irrelevant solutions.

    “They also provide an advanced, restricted version of their method that additionally avoids physically irrelevant solutions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Shimon Even, Alon Itai, and Adi Shamir. "on the complexity of time table and multi-commodity flow problems". In 16th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1975), pages 184-193. IEEE, 1975.
  2. Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gut- mann. A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1411.4028, November 2014. URL https://ui.adsabs. harvard.edu/abs/2014arXiv1411.4028F. · arXiv
  3. Edward Farhi, David Gamarnik, and Sam Gut- mann. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm needs to see the whole graph: Worst case examples, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2005.08747. · arXiv
  4. Edward Farhi, David Gamarnik, and Sam Gut- mann. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm needs to see the whole graph: A typ- ical case, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2004.09002.
  5. Roger Fletcher. Practical methods of optimiza- tion. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., & Potter, A. C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Quantum
Published
2021-07-27
Volume
5
Pages
510
ISSN
2521-327X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036910907
Cited by
19
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DMR-1653007, CCF1648712)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
quantum approximate optimization algorithm, network flow optimization, constrained optimization, edge-disjoint paths, particle-vortex duality, circuit complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review