The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phenomenology: A Philosophy and Method of Inquiry
Open accessAbstract
Phenomenology as a philosophy and a method of inquiry is not limited to an approach to knowing, it is rather an intellectual engagement in interpretations and meaning making that is used to understand the lived world of human beings at a conscious level. Historically, Husserl’ (1913/1962) perspective of phenomenology is a science of understanding human beings at a deeper level by gazing at the phenomenon. However, Heideggerian view of interpretive-hermeneutic phenomenology gives wider meaning to the lived experiences under study. Using this approach, a researcher uses bracketing as a taken for granted assumption in describing the natural way of appearance of phenomena to gain insights into lived experiences and interpret for meaning making. The data collection and analysis takes place side by side to illumine the specific experience to identify the phenomena that is perceived by the actors in a particular situation. The outcomes of a phenomenological study broadens the mind, improves the ways of thinking to see a phenomenon, and it enables to see ahead and define researchers’ posture through intentional study of lived experiences. However, the subjectivity and personal knowledge in perceiving and interpreting it from the research participant’s point of view has been central in phenomenological studies. To achieve such an objective, phenomenology could be used extensively in social sciences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203029053 · Cited by 20,105
(1998) · Cited by 9,332
Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology.
Osborn, A. D., & Husserl, E. (1932) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2015791 · Cited by 3,173
Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry.
Schwandt, T. A. (1994) · Cited by 2,476
Breaking out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology
Hall, M. A., Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3340731 · Cited by 975
Wojnar, D. M., & Swanson, K. M. (2007) · Journal of Holistic Nursing · doi:10.1177/0898010106295172 · Cited by 676
Bracketing in Research: A Typology
Gearing, R. E. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304270394 · Cited by 546 · cited 4×
“…is the study of a phenomenon perceived by human beings at a deeper level of understanding in a specific situation with Vol. 5 No. 1 (June 2018) 218 a detailed description and interpretation of lived experiences through bracketing (Gearing, 2004); as taken-for-granted assumptions by the researchers.”
BackgroundInfluentialPhenomenology in Pediatric Cancer Nursing Research
Fochtman, D. (2008) · Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1177/1043454208319186 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Qutoshi, S. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Education and Educational Development
- Publisher
- Institute of Business Management
- Published
- 2018-05-30
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 215
- ISSN
- 2310-0869 (ISSN-L)
- 2313-3538
- OpenAlex
- W2805096256
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenomenology: A Philosophy and Method of Inquiry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.2154
- The paper
- Qutoshi, S. B. (2018). Phenomenology: A Philosophy and Method of Inquiry. Journal of Education and Educational Development. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.2154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.