The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology.
Abstract
With a new foreword by Dermot Moran ‘the work here presented seeks to found a new science – though, indeed, whole course of philosophical development since Descartes has been preparing way for it – a science covering a new field of experience, exclusively its own, that of Transcendental Subjectivity’ - Edmund Husserl, from author’s preface to English Edition Widely regarded as principal founder of phenomenology, one of most important movements in twentieth century philosophy, Edmund Husserl’s Ideas is one of his most important works and a classic of twentieth century thought. This Routledge Classics edition of original translation by W.R. Boyce Gibson includes introduction to English edition written by Husserl himself in 1931. Husserl’s early thought conceived of phenomenology – general study of what appears to conscious experience – in a relatively narrow way, mainly in relation to problems in logic and theory of knowledge. The publication of Ideas in 1913 witnessed a significant and controversial widening of Husserl’s thought, changing course of phenomenology decisively. Husserl argued that phenomenology was study of very nature of what it is to think, the science of essence of itself. Husserl’s arguments ignited a heated debate regarding nature of consciousness and experience that has endured throughout twentieth and continues in present day. No understanding of twentieth century philosophy is complete without some understanding of Husserl, and his work influenced some of great philosophers of twentieth century, such as Martin Heidegger and Jean-Paul Sartre.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The qualitative research interview
DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x · Cited by 4,995
Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology.
Morrow, S. L. (2005) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250 · Cited by 3,199
Ahmed, S. (2007) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700107078139 · Cited by 2,144
The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research
Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.955224 · Cited by 1,923
Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics
ADLER, E. (1997) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066197003003003 · Cited by 1,446
Metadata
- Authors
- Osborn, A. D., & Husserl, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1932-03-17
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 163
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1536888678
- Cited by
- 3,173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2015791
- The paper
- Osborn, A. D., & Husserl, E. (1932). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. The Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.2307/2015791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.