The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Temperament in Infancy
Abstract
temperament is descnbed, and longitudinal findmgs are reported Temperament dimensions were selected for mvestigation from the work of Thomas, Chess et al, Escalona, Diamond, and others Conceptual analysis of scale definitions was earned out to eliminate conceptual overlap of scales, and item analysis was performed for 463 Infant Behavior Quesbonnaires filled out for 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month-old subjects Scales widi adequate psychometnc and conceptual properbes were developed for the following dimensions activity level, soothabilih', fear, distress to limitabons, smiling and laughter, and duration of orienting In longitudinal analyses, acbvity level and smiling and laughter scales revealed stability from 3 through 12 months, durabon of onenting and soothabihty showed less general stability, and fear and distress to limitabons showed stability only beyond the age of 6 months Temperament as a psychobiological concept has been used m connecbon with the study of mdividual differences m other animal species (Diamond 1957), research on behavior genebcs (Goldsmith & Gottesman 1981), and the study of mdividual differences among human infants (Thomas & Chess 1977) Since the concept of temperament provides an mtegrative approach to the study of the development of individual differences (Rothbart & Derryberry, m press—a) and may eventually allow us to bace the relabon between children's early charactenstics and their social and cognitive development, the task of developing adequate measures for temperament is an important one Although psychologists, pediatricians, and parents have been to some extent aware of temperamental differences among infants, only recently have researchers attempted to develop techniques for assessing temperamental characteristics of infants beyond the neonatal period
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of intelligence in children.
Piaget, J. (1952) · doi:10.1037/11494-000 · Cited by 10,687
Automatic and effortful processes in memory.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356 · Cited by 2,812
Cited by
A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World
Stoltenborgh, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Euser, E. M., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2011) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559511403920 · Cited by 2,010
Behavioral manifestations of autism in the first year of life
Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Rogers, T., Roberts, W., Brian, J., & Szatmari, P. (2005) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.05.001 · Cited by 1,602
Nigg, J. T. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12675 · Cited by 1,518
BEAUCHAINE, T. (2001) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579401002012 · Cited by 1,466
A Unified Theory of Development: A Dialectic Integration of Nature and Nurture
Sameroff, A. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x · Cited by 1,380
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothbart, M. K.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-06-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 569-569
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035705585
- Cited by
- 1,259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Temperament in Infancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1981.tb03082.x
- The paper
- Rothbart, M. K. (1981). Measurement of Temperament in Infancy. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1981.tb03082.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.