The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Assessment of Intention-Cue Detection Skills in Children: Implications for Developmental Psychopathology
Abstract
A reliable measure of children's skills in discriminating intention cues in others was developed for this investigation in order to test the hypothesis that intention-cue detection skill is related to social competence in children. Videotapes were prepared in which one child provoked another child. The intention of the first child varied across videotapes. The subject's task was to discriminate among types of intentions. Care was taken to ensure that scores on this measure were not confounded by a child's verbal capacity or general discrimination skill. This instrument was administered to 176 children in kindergarten, second grade, and fourth grade, who were identified by sociometric measures as having a peer status as popular, average, socially rejected, or socially neglected. Scores on this measure were found to increase as a function of increasing age, and normal children (popular and average) were found to score more highly than deviant children (neglected and rejected). The errors by deviant children tended to consist of erroneous labels of prosocial intentions as hostile. Also, children's statements about their probable behavioral responses to provocations by peers were found to vary as a function of subjects' perceptions of the intention of the peer causing the provocation, not as a function of the actual intention portrayed by the peer. Sociometric status differences in these responses were also found. These findings were consistent with a hypothesis of a developmental lag among socially deviant children in the acquisition of intention-cue detection skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Children's use of intention cues in evaluating behavior.
Karniol, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.76 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74 · Cited by 5,510
Self-citationRelational Aggression, Gender, and Social-Psychological Adjustment
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x · Cited by 3,954
Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146 · Cited by 2,546
Self-citationSocial Withdrawal in Childhood
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., & Bowker, J. C. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163642 · Cited by 1,503
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.113.1.99 · Cited by 1,377
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodge, K. A., Murphy, R. R., & Buchsbaum, K.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018331360
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Assessment of Intention-Cue Detection Skills in Children: Implications for Developmental Psychopathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1129842
- The paper
- Dodge, K. A., Murphy, R. R., & Buchsbaum, K. (1984). The Assessment of Intention-Cue Detection Skills in Children: Implications for Developmental Psychopathology. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.