Cited by 477Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

Children's Spontaneous Control of Facial Expression

Cole, Pamela M.·1986·Child Development

Abstract

COLE, PAMELA M. Children's Spontaneous Control of Facial Expression. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1986, 57, 1309-1321. Spontaneous expressive control of negative emotion was examined in 2 studies of children aged 3-9 using an experimental situation. In Study 1, facial expressions, verbalizations, and spontaneous references to emotional expression control were examined in terms of the child's age and sex and the experimental manipulation (neutral, positive, and mood segments). Results suggested that children attempted to control the display of negative emotion with positive displays and that females did so more than males. No effect of age on expressive behavior was found. Age differences were found for children's spontaneous reference to expressive control, with such references increasing with age. To further examine the possibility that preschoolers engaged in expressive control, Study 2 examined the expressive behavior of 20 preschool girls in the disappointing situation in 2 conditions, alone or with the examiner present. These data indicated that females, aged 3-4, inhibited negative displays when in the presence of the examiner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1130411

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In disappointment task studies, girls displayed less negative emotion than boys in front of the experimenter.

    “In studies using variations of the disappointment task, girls have been found to display less negative emotion than boys and to show more cheeriness than boys when they are in front of the experimenter (e.g., Cole, 1986; Saarni,1984).”
  • In disappointment task studies, girls showed more cheeriness than boys in front of the experimenter.

    “In studies using variations of the disappointment task, girls have been found to display less negative emotion than boys and to show more cheeriness than boys when they are in front of the experimenter (e.g., Cole, 1986; Saarni,1984).”
  • Emotion regulation can occur without conscious awareness.

    “However, emotion regulation may also occur without conscious awareness, such as when one exaggerates one's joy upon receiving an unattractive present ~ Cole, 1986 ! , or when one quickly shifts attention away from something upsetting ~ Boden & Baumeister, 1997 ! .”

    From Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. (2002) · cites this paper as Cole, 1986

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 477

Authors
Cole, P. M.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Cole, Pamela M.
Venue
Child Development
Published
1986-12
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1309
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964775147
Cited by
477
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
facial expressions, expressive control, negative emotions, emotion regulation, children, sex differences, age differences, preschool children, disappointment, social presence, verbalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review