The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prior Beliefs and Cognitive Change in Learning to Teach
Abstract
This is a report of the first year of a longitudinal study to investigate changes in preservice teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about reading instruction before, during, and after a fifth-year teacher education program. In particular, changes in global preprogram beliefs about education, teaching, and learning were traced as preservice teachers acquired specific knowledge of how to manage, assess, and instructionally facilitate students’ learning through text. Researchers interviewed and observed 14 elementary and secondary preservice teachers as they entered the teacher education program, attended reading classes at the university, then taught reading in school classrooms. These qualitative data were analyzed to determine (a) the patterns of intellectual change from novice preservice teacher to beginning classroom teacher; (b) the personal, program, and contextual influences or constraints on that change; (c) the role of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in supporting intellectual change; and (d) the nature of prior beliefs on identity maintenance while learning. Findings include the importance of understanding preservice teachers’ prior beliefs to inform supervision and university course design, the value of cognitive dissonance in practice teaching contexts, the need to routinize classroom management knowledge before attending to subject-specific pedagogy, and the importance of the academic task as part of the teaching knowledge base.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Staff development and the process of teacher change
GUSKEY, T. R. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015005005 · Cited by 1,493
Teaching Student Teachers to Reflect
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j18v7162275t1w3w · Cited by 1,192
Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three Modes of Learning
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1976) · doi:10.21236/ada030406 · Cited by 609
Cited by
Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct
Pajares, M. F. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062003307 · Cited by 9,007
Professional Growth Among Preservice and Beginning Teachers
Kagan, D. M. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062002129 · Cited by 1,960
Implication of Research on Teacher Belief
Kagan, D. M. (1992) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6 · Cited by 1,873
The Place of Story in the Study of Teaching and Teacher Education
CARTER, K. (1993) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x022001005 · Cited by 935
Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0
Korthagen, F. (2016) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523 · Cited by 750
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollingsworth, S.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 1989-01-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-160
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166339423
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 113.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prior Beliefs and Cognitive Change in Learning to Teach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1163030
- The paper
- Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior Beliefs and Cognitive Change in Learning to Teach. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.