The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IMPROVE: A Multidimensional Method for Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classrooms
Abstract
The purpose of the present research was to design an innovative instructional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms (with no tracking) and to investigate its effects on students’ mathematics achievement. The method is based on current theories in social cognition and metacognition. It consists of three interdependent components: metacognitive activities, peer interaction, and systematic provision of feedback-corrective-enrichment. The method is called IMPROVE, the acronym of which represents all the teaching steps that constitute the method: Introducing the new concepts, Metacognitive questioning, Practicing, Reviewing and reducing difficulties, Obtaining mastery, Verification, and Enrichment. The research includes two studies, both implemented in seventh grades: One focused on in-depth analyses of students’ information processing under the different learning conditions (N = 247), and one investigated the development of students’ mathematical reasoning over a full academic year (N = 265). Results of both studies showed that IMPROVE students significantly outperformed the nontreatment control groups on various measures of mathematics achievement. The theoretical and practical implications of the research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions
Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1995) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312032001003 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,259
(2013) · Cited by 834
The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom
Webb, N. M. (2009) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709908x380772 · Cited by 616
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040001281 · Cited by 450
Self-citationDifferentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence
Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 365
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130217450
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.