The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom
Abstract
Background Research on student‐led small‐group learning in schools going back nearly four decades has documented many types of student participation that promote learning. Less is known about how the teacher can foster effective groupwork behaviours. Aims This paper reviews research that explores the role of the teacher in promoting learning in small groups. The focus is on how students can learn from their peers during small‐group work, how teachers can prepare students for collaborative group work, and the role of teacher discourse and classroom norms in small‐group dialogue. Method Studies selected for review focused on student‐led small‐group contexts for learning in which students were expected to collaborate, reported data from systematic observations of group work, and linked observational data to teacher practices and student learning outcomes. Results and conclusions This review uncovered multiple dimensions of the teacher's role in fostering beneficial group dialogue, including preparing students for collaborative work, forming groups, structuring the group‐work task, and influencing student interaction through teachers' discourse with small groups and with the class. Common threads through the research are the importance of students explaining their thinking, and teacher strategies and practices that may promote student elaboration of ideas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0612 · Cited by 5,464
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Handbook of educational psychology
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3084 · Cited by 4,825
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Language and Thought of the Child: Selected Works vol 5
Piaget, J. (2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203992739 · Cited by 2,624
The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom
(2000) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220270050167215 · Cited by 2,546
Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups
Cohen, E. G. (1994) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543064001001 · Cited by 2,120
Rousing minds to life: teaching, learning, and schooling in social context
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-6394 · Cited by 2,019
Cited by
van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001 · Cited by 355
“The reviews by Dobber et al. (2014), Kaendler et al. (2015), and Webb (2009) lack the hallmarks of systematic research reviews, such as a systematic and exhaustive survey of the literature, quality assessment of the uncovered studies, application of inclusion and/or exclusion criteria, and a…”
BackgroundInfluentialArgumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 · Cited by 338
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z · Cited by 220
van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258 · Cited by 168
“Yet it is less clear how teachers can support students’ learning in the setting of small-group work (e.g., Webb, 2009).”
BackgroundHow student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction
Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, N. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W2106131327
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 22.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000709908x380772
- The paper
- Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908x380772
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.