Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Flunking Grades: Research and Policies on Retention

Wilson, Mark, Shepard, L. A., Smith, M. L.·1990·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Abstract

A meta-analysis of research on grade retention, C.T.Holmes a review of research on kindergarten retention, L.A.Shepard academic and emotional effects of kindergarten in one school district, L.A.Shepard and M.L.Smith attitudes of parents, students and educators toward repeating a grade, D.Byrnes teachers' beliefs about retention, M.L.Smith ending school promotion in Waterford - appearance and reality, M.C.Ellwein and G.V.Glass repeating and dropping out of school, J.Grissom and L.A.Shepard alternatives to student retention - new images of the learner, the teacher and classroom learning, P.L.Peterson policy implications of retention research, E.House.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1163635

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, M., Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L.
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
1990
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
228
ISSN
0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049260400
Cited by
478
References
0
FWCI
162.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flunking Grades: Research and Policies on Retention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1163635
The paper
Wilson, M., Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1990). Flunking Grades: Research and Policies on Retention. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163635

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.