Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cooperative Activities in the Classroom

Bossert, Steven T.·1988·Review of Research in Education

Abstract

Cooperation is an important part of group life. Its benefits range from the autotelic quality of working along with others on a shared task to its perceived function as the cornerstone of modern democracy. In the classroom, cooperation is both a skill necessary for the accomplishment of learning activities and a general norm to be learned. However, the average classroom in the United States (and probably elsewhere) exposes students to instructional activities and evaluation systems that foster their dependence on the teacher, restrict productive interactions among students, and enhance divisive status distinctions among peers. Despite the concern of some educators, teacherdirected and whole-class activities persist in schools. The cooperative learning methods movement has been an attempt to rectify this situation. During the last 15 years, several important cooperative learning techniques have been developed and tested, and hundreds of accompanying studies have sought to document the value of one or another cooperative learning approach over instruction. In general, the research has successfully demonstrated that student achievement is at least as high, and often higher, in cooperative learning activities as in traditional classrooms. At the same time, cooperative learning methods seem to promote positive interpersonal relations, motivation to learn, and self-esteem among students. Recent meta-analyses suggest that the benefits of cooperative learning activities hold for students at all age levels, for all subject areas, and for a wide range of tasks, such as those involving rote-decoding, retention, and memory skills, as well as problem-solving ability (Johnson, Johnson, & Maruyama, 1983; Johnson, Maruyama, Johnson, Nelson, & Skon, 1981; Slavin, 1983).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1167365

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Bossert, S. T.
Venue
Review of Research in Education
Published
1988
Volume
15
Pages
225
ISSN
0091-732X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994009692
Cited by
205
References
5
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperative Activities in the Classroom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1167365
The paper
Bossert, S. T. (1988). Cooperative Activities in the Classroom. Review of Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167365

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.