Cited by 167Management Theory and PracticeSocial Power and Status DynamicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Interdependence, Differential Rewarding, and Productivity

Miller, L. Keith, Hamblin, Robert L.·1963·American Sociological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2089914

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 167

Authors
Miller, L. K., & Hamblin, R. L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1963-10
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
768
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321812409
Cited by
167
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
interdependence, productivity, work teams, reward allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review