The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attributional Analysis of Achievement-Related Behavior
Abstract
In recent years, one of the most active areas of social psychological research has been the investigation of how individuals in everyday life figure out what causes behavior. Attribution theory is a term given to various theories concerned with the problem of investigating causal perception (e.g., Jones, Kanouse, Kelley, Nisbett, Valins, & Weiner, 1972). An is the inference that an observer makes about the causes of behavior-either his own or another person's. One application of attribution theory that has a direct relevance to education was undertaken by Weiner (Weiner, Frieze, Kukla, Reed, Rest, & Rosenbaum, 1971). Weiner et al. attempted to analyze individuals' achievement-related behavior as determined by individuals' causal perception of successes and failures. Although Weiner (1972a) introduced the basic principles of his model to educational researchers, the accumulation of new research has refined the model and presented new possibilities for its application to education. In particular, the model could be used to explain students' performance on learning tasks. This paper systematically reviews the attributional model of achievement-related behavior and suggests possible educational implications. The paper will review recent research on individual differences when causal attributions are made about successes and failures. First, the attributional model of achievement behavior will be presented. Second, evidence that shows individual differences in making attributions will be surveyed. Third, studies that illustrate differential performance on achievement-related tasks by individuals who differ in their attributions will be reviewed. Finally, educational implications will be discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories.
Parsons, J. E., Adler, T., & Meece, J. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.1.26 · Cited by 802
Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004 · Cited by 743
Family factors and student achievement: An avenue to increase students' success.
Christenson, S. L., Rounds, T., & Gorney, D. (1992) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/h0088259 · Cited by 390
Affective Variables and Mathematics Education
Reyes, L. H. (1984) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461384 · Cited by 377
Musical Motivation: Towards a model synthesising the research
Hallam, S. (2002) · Music Education Research · doi:10.1080/1461380022000011939 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Bar-Tal, D.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171690419
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attributional Analysis of Achievement-Related Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170084
- The paper
- Bar-Tal, D. (1978). Attributional Analysis of Achievement-Related Behavior. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.