The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Qualitative Research Traditions: A Review
Abstract
This article illustrates how various qualitative traditions could be used in educational research by describing and comparing the traditions of ecological psychology, holistic ethnography, cognitive anthropology, ethnography of communication, and symbolic interactionism. The analysis shows that qualitative traditions present diverse approaches to research and that each tradition forms a coherent whole, comprising internally consistent assumptions about human nature and society, foci of study, and methodology. Implications of the analysis suggest that qualitative traditions may offer a richer and fuller understanding of education. Educational researchers could conduct either basic or applied research within these traditions, or they could adapt the traditions to address new problems. Moreover, it is suggested that educators who wish to perform qualitative research should seek to employ the totality of a tradition, not just generic assumptions or methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom
Mehan, H. (1979) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 · Cited by 2,872
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160
Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue
Smith, J. K. (1983) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x012003006 · Cited by 608
Cited by
A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000097254001 · Cited by 2,884
(2008) · Cited by 2,615
Guided Participation in Cultural Activity by Toddlers and Caregivers
Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., Mosier, C., Chavajay, P., Heath, S. B., & Goncu, A. (1993) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166109 · Cited by 892
Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
FIRESTONE, W. A. (1987) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x016007016 · Cited by 738
(2015) · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacob, E.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141402192
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 97.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.