Cited by 738Educational Research and MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research

FIRESTONE, WILLIAM A.·1987·Educational Researcher

Abstract

The current debate about quantitative and qualitative methods focuses on whether there is a necessary connection between method-type and research paradigm that makes the different approaches incompatible. This paper argues that part of the connection is rhetorical. Quantitative methods express the assumptions of a positvisit paradigm which holds that behavior can be explained through objective facts. Design and instrumentation persuade by showing how bias and error are eliminated. Qualitative methods express the assumptions of a phenomenological paradigm that there are multiple realities that are socially defined. Rich description persuades by showing that the researcher was immersed in the setting and giving the reader enough detail to “make sense” of the situation. While rhetorically different, the results of the two methodologies can be complementary. Examples are drawn from two studies using different methodologies to study the same problem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x016007016

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FIRESTONE, W. A.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
FIRESTONE, WILLIAM A.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
1987-10
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
16-21
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2004538745
Cited by
738
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 28
FWCI
71.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
quantitative research, qualitative research, research paradigms, positivism, phenomenology, research design, instrumentation, researcher immersion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review