The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Competence and Affective Characteristics of Students with Mild Disabilities
Abstract
Empirical research examining the social competence and affective functioning of children with mild disabilities was reviewed. Mild-disability groups included children variously classified as having specific learning disabilities, mild mental retardation, behavior disorders, and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Social competence was conceptualized as a multidimensional construct that included social skills, adaptive behavior, and peer relationship variables. Children with mild disabilities were shown to have difficulties in negotiating both peer-related and teacher-related adjustments in school settings. Consistent with previous reviews, this review showed that children with mild disabilities had poorer social skills, exhibited more interfering problem behaviors, and were poorly accepted or rejected by peers. Conflicting evidence in the literature exists as it relates to the general self-esteem levels of various groups of students with mild disabilities. These findings were interpreted in terms of social comparison theory. The review concludes with a discussion of the methodological issues that should be addressed before the social competence and affective characteristics of children with mild disabilities can be understood more fully. These issues include sampling designs, heterogeneity of samples, influences of demographic variables, nosological error, and the paucity of available longitudinal research on these and related questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543046003407 · Cited by 4,164
Children's loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status.
Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.53.4.500 · Cited by 841
What can specificity designs say about causality in psychopathology research?
Garber, J., & Hollon, S. D. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.129 · Cited by 233
Cited by
Nowicki, E. A., & Sandieson, R. (2002) · International Journal of Disability, Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912022000007270 · Cited by 306
Social Participation of Students with Special Needs in Regular Primary Education in the Netherlands
Koster, M., Pijl, S. J., Nakken, H., & Van Houten, E. (2010) · International Journal of Disability, Development and Education · doi:10.1080/10349120903537905 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Gresham, F. M., & MacMillan, D. L.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 377
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158033998
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Competence and Affective Characteristics of Students with Mild Disabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170514
- The paper
- Gresham, F. M., & MacMillan, D. L. (1997). Social Competence and Affective Characteristics of Students with Mild Disabilities. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.