The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Concepts and Methods of Phenomenographic Research
Abstract
This article reviews the nature of “phenomenographic” research and its alleged conceptual underpinnings in the phenomenological tradition. In common with other attempts to apply philosophical phenomenology to the social sciences, it relies on participants' discursive accounts of their experiences and cannot validly postulate causal mental entities such as conceptions of learning. The analytic procedures of phenomenography are very similar to those of grounded theory, and like the latter they fall foul of the “dilemma of qualitative method” in failing to reconcile the search for authentic understanding with the need for scientific rigor. It is argued that these conceptual and methodological difficulties could be resolved by a constructionist revision of phenomenographic research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001 · Cited by 3,537
‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory
Charmaz, K. (1990) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90256-r · Cited by 1,648
Qualitative research and psychological theorizing
Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1992) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x · Cited by 808
Recovered Memories and False Memories
(1997) · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780198523864.001.0001 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12718 · Cited by 156
Cram School Students’ Conceptions of Learning and Learning Science in Taiwan
Tsai, C., & Kuo, P. (2008) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690701191425 · Cited by 105
The erosion of a method: examples from grounded theory
Greckhamer, T., & Koro‐Ljungberg, M. (2005) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518390500298204 · Cited by 95
Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., Rhodehamel, B., & Diamond, J. (2012) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2012.656362 · Cited by 59
The concept of neutrality: a new approach
Macdonald, S., & Birdi, B. (2019) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-05-2019-0102 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, J. T. E.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153913170
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 23.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.