The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
English-as-a-Second-Language Learners' Cognitive Reading Processes: A Review of Research in the United States
Abstract
An integrative review of United States research on English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners’ cognitive reading processes suggested that, on the whole, ESL readers recognized cognate vocabulary fairly well, monitored their comprehension and used many metacognitive strategies, used schema and prior knowledge to affect comprehension and recall, and were affected differently by different types of text structures. In the main, where United States ESL readers’ processes appeared to be used differently from those of native English readers, the differences were in speed and depressed activation of selected processes. Significantly, overall, the findings from the studies suggested a relatively good fit to preexisting reading theories and views generally thought to describe native-language readers. However, the quantitative differences between processes of ESL readers and those of native English readers indicated that the preexisting theories and views might need to be revisited and elaborated to address a subset of factors special to ESL learners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children
Cummins, J. (1979) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1169960 · Cited by 3,318
CULTURAL THOUGHT PATTERNS IN INTER‐CULTURAL EDUCATION
Kaplan, R. B. (1966) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x · Cited by 2,069
Four Misconceptions About Language Proficiency in Bilingual Education
Cummins, J. (1981) · NABE Journal · doi:10.1080/08855072.1981.10668409 · Cited by 92
Cited by
Educating English Language Learners: A Synthesis of Research Evidence
Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, B., & Christian, D. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511499913 · Cited by 743
Nassaji, H. (2002) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00189 · Cited by 271
IVEY, G., & BROADDUS, K. (2007) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.42.4.4 · Cited by 106
Keung, Y.-C., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2009) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.11.001 · Cited by 97
Goodrich, J. M., Lonigan, C. J., & Farver, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031780 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzgerald, J.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114066795
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: English-as-a-Second-Language Learners' Cognitive Reading Processes: A Review of Research in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170711
- The paper
- Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English-as-a-Second-Language Learners' Cognitive Reading Processes: A Review of Research in the United States. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.