The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coming to Terms with Atrocities: A Review of Accountability Mechanisms for Mass Violations of Human Rights
Abstract
The field of human psychology has taught the lay world a principle regarding personal emotion that is now taken as a given: To ensure good mental health and stability, it is crucial that individuals emerging from massive abuse and trauma develop appropriate mechanisms to confront and process that past experience, facilitating closure rather than repression. Figuring out which approach or mechanism will be most helpful to the healing process will vary from person to person, and will be determined in part by the background and makeup of the particular individual as well as by the nature of the trauma endured. But, for both victims and perpetrators of past abuse, dealing with the reality and consequences of its occurrence is essential. In responding to such trauma, groups and nations tend to function similarly to individuals. Societies shattered by the perpetration of atrocities need to adapt or design mechanisms to confront their demons, to reckon with these past abuses. Otherwise, for nations, as for individuals, the past will haunt and infect the present and future in unpredictable ways. The assumption that individuals or groups who have been the victims of hideous atrocities will simply forget about them or expunge their feelings without some form of accounting, some semblance of justice, is to leave in place the seeds of future conflict.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Trials can provide “a sense that…grievances have been addressed and can hopefully be put to rest, rather than smoldering in anticipation of the next round of conflict” (Kritz 1996, 128).”
From Conflict Recurrence and Postconflict Justice: Addressing Motivations and Opportunities for Sustainable Peace (2017) · cites this paper as Kritz 1996
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–144 of 144
The role played by reconciliation in social reconstruction in Bougainville
Wallis, J. (2019) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.22459/cstjap.2019.07
A Holistic Approach to Transitional Justice for Afghanistan
Besmel, P. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-6646-6.ch012
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.008
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.005
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.003
ICTY Prosecutions as of June 20181
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.010
Non-Derogation and International Criminal Law
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.004
Refugee Law in Context: Natural Law, Legal Positivism and the ConventionPreprint
Kfir, İ. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2493157
de Clerck, D. (2022) · L Année du Maghreb · doi:10.4000/anneemaghreb.10112
A Commitment is a Commitment is a Commitment?
Hagen, J. (2019) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-7482
Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Versöhnung in Transitional-Justice-Prozessen
Ottendörfer, E. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-02994-4_3-2
Shelton, D. L. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207534.003.0007
Shelton, D. L. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207534.003.0016
Shelton, D. L. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207534.003.0001
Shelton, D. L. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207534.003.0008
Shelton, D. L. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207534.003.0010
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.001
When Non-Derogable Principles Meet Criminal Liability
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.006
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.012
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.011
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.009
History, Trials, and Collective Memory
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.007
Carlson, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278157.002
Are domestic war crimes trials biased?
Sokolić, I., Kostovicova, D., Lova, L. L., & Vico, S. (2024) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433241292143 · Cited by 1
Gonser, K. S. (2025) · The International Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/13642987.2025.2508459
Justice in Action: Assessing the Institutional Design and Implementation of Transitional Justice
Miller, J. L. (2014) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Andrieu, K. (2010) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/efd8daa7z672dz448az93ebz97cc9801fa0b
Shifting Shadows: United Nations Peacekeeping and Repertoires of Violence in Conflict Zones
Ioannidis, N., & Kovras, I. (2026) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksag117
Metadata
- Authors
- Kritz, N. J.
- Corresponding author
- Kritz, Neil J.
- Venue
- Law and Contemporary Problems
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 127
- ISSN
- 0023-9186 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1569480047
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Law and Contemporary Problems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
- Keywords
- accountability mechanisms, mass atrocities, human rights violations, transitional justice, truth commissions, reconciliation, trauma processing, victims and perpetrators, collective memory, post-conflict societies, future war
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review