Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,434

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations

Lau, Lawrence J., Myrdal, Gunnar·1969·Stanford Law Review

Abstract

Every once in a long while the flood of new publications will wash a book onto the market that manages a particularly astute grasp of our present situation with a combination of originality and sharp analytical under standing. We may then be provided with an entirely new basis for the discussion of some of our traditional problems. Such is the case with Gunnar Myrdal's new epic An Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. Myrdal's inquiry into the economic problems of the countries of South Asia lasted nearly ten years. The result is a three-volume study of monu mental proportions covering 2,284 pages. Prologue and introduction alone run to 70 pages and are, strictly speaking, already a small, self-contained book on problems of applied methodology. A search for a handy con cluding chapter turns out to be in vain. A course in speed-reading, then, appears to be a prerequisite. This book has been received in the West with decided discomfort, not to say horror, while in the underdeveloped countries of Asia it has caused consternation and pain: horror in the West for fear that Myrdal is saying the billions spent on development aid over the last 20 years have been wasted; pain in Asia for fear that he is saying the whole economic and social mess is really the fault of the Asians themselves. v Myrdal is saying both. Indeed, his analysis bears some superficial re semblance to the rhetoric that comes out of Peking, Algiers and Havana. But he has scrupulously avoided the doctrinaire muddle that has paralyzed development in China, Algeria and Cuba. Instead he opts for a new pragmatism that is neither pure capitalism nor pure Marxism but incor porates elements of both. His emphasis is on clarity of expression and thought, his search for true scientific freedom from bias and prejudice. This was no easy task. The difficulties started with the available statis tics that have been quoted in professional journals and elsewhere for a long time and with surprising confidence. Myrdal found, however, that in 118

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1227572

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,434

Metadata

Authors
Lau, L. J., & Myrdal, G.
Venue
Stanford Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1969-04
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
967
ISSN
0038-9765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049893405
Cited by
1,434
References
0
FWCI
205.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1227572
The paper
Lau, L. J., & Myrdal, G. (1969). Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. Stanford Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227572

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.