The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace
Abstract
Global computer-based communications cut across territorial borders, creating a new realm of human activity and undermining the feasibility--and legitimacy--of applying laws based on geographic boundaries. While these electronic communications play havoc with geographic boundaries, a new boundary, made up of the screens and passwords that separate the virtual world from the real world of atoms, emerges. This new boundary defines a distinct Cyberspace that needs and can create new law and legal institutions of its own. Territorially-based law-making and law-enforcing authorities find this new environment deeply threatening. But established territorial authorities may yet learn to defer to the self-regulatory efforts of Cyberspace participants who care most deeply about this new digital trade in ideas, information, and services. Separated from doctrine tied to territorial jurisdictions, new rules will emerge, in a variety of on-line spaces, to govern a wide range of new phenomena that have no clear parallel in the nonvirtual world. These new rules will play the role of law by defining legal personhood and property, resolving disputes, and crystallizing a collective conversation about core values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Farrell, H. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815 · Cited by 387
Michaels, R. (2009) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172311 · Cited by 363
Blockchain Regulation and Governance in Europe
Finck, M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108609708 · Cited by 203
The territorialization of cyberspace
Lambach, D. (2020) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viz022 · Cited by 151
Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the European Union
Cortés, P. (2010) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9780203847756 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, D. R., & Post, D.
- Venue
- Stanford Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1367
- ISSN
- 0038-9765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2796508300
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 98.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1229390
- The paper
- Johnson, D. R., & Post, D. (1996). Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229390
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.