The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS
Open accessAbstract
Root-associated entomopathogenic fungi (R-AEF) indirectly influence herbivorous insect performance.However, host plant-R-AEF interactions and R-AEF as biological control agents have been studied independently and without much attention to the potential synergy between these functional traits.In this study, we evaluated behavioral responses of cabbage root flies [Delia radicum L. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)] to a host plant (white cabbage cabbage Brassica oleracea var.capitata f. alba cv.Castello L.) with and without the R-AEF Metarhizium brunneum (Petch).We performed experiments on leaf reflectance, phytohormonal composition and host plant location behavior (behavioral processes that contribute to locating and selecting an adequate host plant in the environment).Compared to control host plants, R-AEF inoculation caused, on one hand, a decrease in reflectance of host plant leaves in the near-infrared portion of the radiometric spectrum and, on the other, an increase in the production of jasmonic, (+)-7-iso-jasmonoyl-l-isoleucine and salicylic acid in certain parts of the host plant.Under both greenhouse and field settings, landing and oviposition by cabbage root fly females were positively affected by R-AEF inoculation of host plants.The fungal-induced change in leaf reflectance may have altered visual cues used by the cabbage root flies in their host plant selection.This is the first study providing evidence for the hypothesis that R-AEF manipulate the suitability of their host plant to attract herbivorous insects.Biological interactions between plants and root-inhabiting fungi have been found in the fossil record 1 , implying a symbiotic success story.Furthermore, no plant species is known to grow successfully without a relationship with fungi 2 .Root-associated fungi can colonize both the internal and external parts of developing roots without damaging the host plant 3 .The presence of root inhabiting fungi is associated with enhancements in plant growth, i.e. fungal endophytes facilitate host uptake of soil nutrients and water 4 .Concurrently with functional research into complex ecological interactions between plant-associated fungi, their host plants and plant-associated insects there are also applied studies describing the use of multiple strains of Beauveria spp.and Metarhizium spp.(Hypocreales: Ascomycota) as root-associated entomopathogenic fungi (R-AEF) 5 .R-AEF can be plant endophytes and soil saprophytes, and some have been reported to reduce herbivore damage by direct insect infection and are commercially available for arthropod pest management in a wide range of cropping systems 6 .In addition, R-AEF have been shown to increase host plant resistance to arthropod herbivores by triggering plant induced systemic resistance or to produce secondary metabolites that elicit feeding deterrence and antibiosis to herbivorous insect 6 .When R-AEF are considered to act as bodyguards, host plants are believed to manipulate insect pathogens to increase their own fitness 7 .However, this concept remains purely speculative and morecomplex interactions involving R-AEF and host plants can be expected, mainly due to the inherent risks in terms of increasing herbivorous insect attack 8,9 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
Cited by
Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors
Zhang, Z. (2016) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2016.03.37 · Cited by 1,294
(2005) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.123.11.1484 · Cited by 739
Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s617 · Cited by 647
3D deeply supervised network for automated segmentation of volumetric medical images
Dou, Q., Yu, L., Chen, H., Jin, Y., Yang, X., Qin, J., & Heng, P.-A. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.05.001 · Cited by 613
Principal Component Analysis: A Natural Approach to Data Exploration
Gewers, F. L., Ferreira, G. R., Arruda, H. F. D., Silva, F. N., Comin, C. H., Amancio, D. R., & Costa, L. D. F. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3447755 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- James, D. A., Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4289257140
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1268908
- The paper
- James, D. A., Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (1996). Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.