The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handbook of Organizational Measurement
Abstract
Addresses the standardization of the measurements and the labels for concepts commonly used in the study of work organizations. As a reference handbook and research tool, seeks to improve measurement in the study of work organizations and to facilitate the teaching of introductory courses in this subject. Focuses solely on work organizations, that is, social systems in which members work for money. Defines measurement and distinguishes four levels: nominal, ordinal, interval and ratio. Selects specific measures on the basis of quality, diversity, simplicity and availability and evaluates each measure for its validity and reliability. Employs a set of 38 concepts ‐ ranging from “absenteeism” to “turnover” as the handbook’s frame of reference. Concludes by reviewing organizational measurement over the past 30 years and recommending future measurement reseach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
(1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,439
Social Theory and Social Structure
Ross, E. J., & Merton, R. K. (1958) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709394 · Cited by 10,315
Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis
Becker, G. S. (1962) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/258724 · Cited by 8,063
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145
Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037335 · Cited by 5,721
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967) · Cited by 5,206
The division of labor in society
Durkheim, É. (1935) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.4324/9780429499838-5 · Cited by 5,156
Cited by
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires
Hinkin, T. R. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819800100106 · Cited by 4,095
Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400 · Cited by 3,864
Factors affecting trust in market research relationships
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700106 · Cited by 3,659
Moorman, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.6.845 · Cited by 3,422
Metadata
- Authors
- Aldrich, B. C., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W.
- Venue
- Teaching Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465
- ISSN
- 0092-055X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001357527
- Cited by
- 1,113
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 25.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handbook of Organizational Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1318173
- The paper
- Aldrich, B. C., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1988). Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Teaching Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.