Cited by 8,063Economic Growth and ProductivityLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityEducation and Labor Relations

Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis

Becker, Gary S.·1962·Journal of Political Economy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/258724

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, G. S.
Corresponding author
Becker, Gary S.
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
1962-10
Volume
70
Issue
5, Part 2
Pages
9-49
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W1971310904
Cited by
8,063
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 309 · 2025: 478 · 2024: 486 · 2023: 484 · 2022: 444 · 2021: 466 · 2020: 490 · 2019: 470 · 2018: 384 · 2017: 357 · 2016: 350 · 2015: 317 · 2014: 324 · 2013: 308 · 2012: 295
FWCI
29.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Labor Relations
Keywords
human capital, human capital investment, returns to education, skill development, economic growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review