Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 780

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sexual Dimorphism and Differential Niche Utilization in Birds

Open access
Selander, Robert K.·1966·The Condor

Abstract

Adaptive radiation has been defined as the evolutionary divergence of members of a phyletic line into different niches or adaptive zones (Mayr, 1963:633).Although it has been customary to think of adaptive radiation solely in terms of species or races, a growing body of evidence indicates that some degree of radiation occurs also within populations, as individuals come to occupy different subniches or adaptive subzones, subdividing and, perhaps, expanding the total niche or zone utilized by the population.Probably all species show some degree of ecological variation, either polymorphic or continuous.But this phenomenon is being studied in only a few groups of organisms, notably in Drosophila, in which chromosomal polymorphism has been interpreted as a. means of adaptation of populations to heterogeneous environments (Dobzhansky, * 1961, 1963, 1965).Theoretical bases for research on ecological variation in animal populations have been provided by Ludwig (1950), Levene (1953)) da Cunha and Dobzhansky (1954), Dempster (1955), Li (1955), Carson (1959), and Levins (1962, 1963).In birds, as in other vertebrates, the sexes usually differ in size if not also in proportions of body parts, including those used in feeding (Amadon, 1959) ; and, especially where the degree of sexual dimorphism, which is a form of polymorphism (Ford, 1961: 12), is marked, it seems probable that the morphological divergence has ecological significance in adapting the sexes to different subniches.However, there is only an occasional reference in the literature to sexual dimorphism in relation to niche utilization (e.g., Pitelka, 1950; Rand, 19.52), and, in general, the whole problem of ecological variation in populations has been neglected by vertebrate ecologists.The primary purpose of this report is to present evidence of an adaptive function of sexual dimorphism in size in woodpeckers by relating degrees of morphological dimorphism and sexual divergence in foraging behavior in two melanerpine species, the strongly dimorphic Hispaniolan Woodpecker (Centurus striatus) of Haiti and the Dominican Republic and the moderately dimorphic Golden-fronted Woodpecker (Ce&zmus awifrons)of continental North and Central America.In addition, the paper surveys other evidence that sexual dimorphism in birds is related to differential niche utilization.Finally, some evolutionary aspects of sexual dimorphism and ecological variation are considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1365712

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 780

Metadata

Authors
Selander, R. K.
Venue
The Condor
Published
1966-03
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
113-151
ISSN
  • 0010-5422 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5129
OpenAlex
W2084499670
Cited by
780
References
2
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.