Cited by 756Religion and Society InteractionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCulture, Economy, and Development Studies

Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach

Iannaccone, Laurence R.·1990·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

This study uses the economic concepts of household production and human capital to develop and test a new model of religious participation. The model explains observed patterns in denoniinational mobility, religious intermarriage, conversion ages, the relationships between church attendance and contributions, and the influence of upbringing and interfaith marriage on levels of religious participation. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND The past few decades have seen major progress in the social scientific study of religion. The body of data on religious behavior has grown immensely; the statistical techniques and computing power needed to analyze these data have grown even more. As a consequence, many of the basic facts of religious behavior have become known. Unfortunately, these empirical gains have not been matched by theoretical ones (Stark and Bainbridge 1987). If empirical research is to avoid diminishing returns, it must be based on conceptual models general enough to account for a range of related behaviors and precise enough to test meaningfully. The economic concepts of household production and human capital may provide the basis for such a model, one that explains observed patterns in denominational mobility, religious intermarriage, conversion ages, the relationship between church attendance and contributions, and the influence of upbringing and interfaith marriage on levels of religious participation. This paper (1) reviews how economists have used the concepts of household production and human capital; (2) introduces a model of religious practice based upon these concepts; (3) outlines the predictions that follow from the model; and (4) shows how the predictions were tested against observed behavior. The paper draws heavily from my

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1386460

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iannaccone, L. R.
Corresponding author
Iannaccone, Laurence R.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1990-09
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
297
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033883929
Cited by
756
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 33
FWCI
26.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Keywords
religious participation, religious behavior, household production, human capital, religious conversion, interfaith marriage, church attendance, church contributions, religious upbringing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review