The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Religious Orientations and the Targets of Discrimination
Abstract
In this study, fundamentalism, extrinsic, intrinsic, and quest religious orientations were used to predict discriminatory attitudes toward blacks, women, homosexual persons, and communists. The four discriminations yielded a strong tendency to discriminate factor, while residuals for each scale reflected unique discriminatory attitudes toward each group. As predicted, fundamentalism correlated positively with all discriminatory attitudes and with the general tendency but was negatively correlated with residual anti-black attitudes. Quest (especially with a revised scale) correlated negatively with all discriminatory attitudes, even with fundamentalism controlled, but predicted a general Don't discriminate! attitude rather than positive attitudes toward particular groups. Several sex differences emerged for extrinsic and intrinsic religion: Analyses with three extrinsic religion subscales found that social-extrinsic and personal-extrinsic religion predicted males' discrimination, while religious seriousness predicted females' discrimination. Also, intrinsic religion was positively related to discriminatory attitudes for females but not males, though these relationships vanished when fundamentalism was controlled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
"From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior.
Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034449 · Cited by 1,665
Cited by
A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414 · Cited by 1,085
Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective
Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134370 · Cited by 954
Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A Meta-Analytic Review of Religious Racism
Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352179 · Cited by 431
Religiosity and Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men: A Meta-Analysis
Whitley, B. E. (2009) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508610802471104 · Cited by 412
An Intergroup Perspective on Religion and Prejudice
Jackson, L. M., & Hunsberger, B. (1999) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1387609 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- McFarland, S. G.
- Venue
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 324
- ISSN
- 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313294138
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Religious Orientations and the Targets of Discrimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1386743
- The paper
- McFarland, S. G. (1989). Religious Orientations and the Targets of Discrimination. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.