An Intergroup Perspective on Religion and Prejudice
Abstract
Based on the reasoning that religious groups evidence intergroup processes that can create prejudice, two studies examined the relation between religiosity and attitudes toward religious and non-religious others. In both studies, among more religious individuals, attitudes toward religious others were very positive and attitudes toward non-religious others were quite negative. These relations emerged on all measures of traditional religiosity used. Some prejudice against religious others existed among less religious individuals, but it was less pronounced and less pervasive than the prejudice of more religious people. It is suggested that intergroup processes such as competition between religious groups for resources or value promotion likely foster prejudice against religious outgroup members, perhaps irrespective of personal religious orientation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Religious participants showed significant positive attitudes towards in-group-religious others but negative attitudes towards non-religious others.
“They found that the religious participants showed significant positive attitudes towards in-group-religious others but negative attitudes towards non-religious others.”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Jackson and Hunsberger 1999
The magnitude of prejudice was correspondent to the individual's own level of religiosity.
“As well, the magnitude of the prejudice was correspondent to the individual's own level of religiosity.”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Jackson and Hunsberger 1999
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467 · see citing works
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682 · see citing works
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673 · see citing works
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01244.x · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 · Cited by 1,588 · see citing works
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Zuckerman, P. (2009) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00247.x · Cited by 239 · see citing works
In Godlessness We Distrust: Using Social Psychology to Solve the Puzzle of Anti‐atheist Prejudice
Gervais, W. M. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12035 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Differentiating psychosis and faith: the role of social norms and religious fundamentalism
O’Connor, S., & Vandenberg, B. (2010) · Mental Health, Religion & Culture · doi:10.1080/13674670903277984 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jackson, L. M., & Hunsberger, B.
- Affiliations
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- ORCID
- Jackson, Lynne M.
- Venue
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 509
- ISSN
- 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318580884
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- religiosity, prejudice, intergroup relations, intergroup competition, value promotion, religious groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review