The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Cluster-Specific and Population-Averaged Approaches for Analyzing Correlated Binary Data
Abstract
J. M. Neuhaus, J. D. Kalbfleisch, W. W. Hauck, A Comparison of Cluster-Specific and Population-Averaged Approaches for Analyzing Correlated Binary Data, International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, Vol. 59, No. 1 (Apr., 1991), pp. 25-35
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
Information theory and statistics
(1959) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(59)90368-0 · Cited by 7,094
Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.
Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980) · PubMed · Cited by 4,988
Models for Longitudinal Data: A Generalized Estimating Equation Approach
Zeger, S. L., Liang, K.-Y., & Albert, P. S. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531734 · Cited by 4,505
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
White, H. (1983) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912004 · Cited by 3,674
Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies
(1983) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0278-6915(83)90281-8 · Cited by 1,716
Correlated Binary Regression with Covariates Specific to Each Binary Observation
Prentice, R. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531733 · Cited by 856
Random-Effects Models for Serial Observations with Binary Response
Stiratelli, R., Laird, N., & Ware, J. H. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531147 · Cited by 733
GAIL, M. H., WIEAND, S., & PIANTADOSI, S. (1984) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/71.3.431 · Cited by 698
Williams, D. A. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529820 · Cited by 510
Cited by
Hubbard (2010) · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181caeb90 · Cited by 1,139
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios
Austin, P. C. (2013) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.5705 · Cited by 1,006
Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference
Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009211805 · Cited by 933
Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership
Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0795 · Cited by 927
15 Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials
Kenward, M. G., & Jones, B. (2007) · Handbook of Statistics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7161(07)27015-4 · Cited by 871
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuhaus, J. M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Hauck, W. W.
- Venue
- International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25
- ISSN
- 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316220834
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Cluster-Specific and Population-Averaged Approaches for Analyzing Correlated Binary Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1403572
- The paper
- Neuhaus, J. M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Hauck, W. W. (1991). A Comparison of Cluster-Specific and Population-Averaged Approaches for Analyzing Correlated Binary Data. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
