Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 510

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

394: The Analysis of Binary Responses from Toxicological Experiments Involving Reproduction and Teratogenicity

Williams, D. A.·1975·Biometrics

Abstract

This paper describes a parametric method for analyzing binary response data from completely randomized experiments in which the experimental units are animal litters. Responses within a litter are assumed to form a set of Bernoulli trials whose success probability varies between litters in the same treatment group according to a two parameter beta distribution. The parameters of the beta distribution for each treatment are estimated by maximum likelihood and treatment differences are tested by asymptotic likelihood ratio tests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2529820

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 510

Metadata

Authors
Williams, D. A.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1975-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
949
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322775683
Cited by
510
References
1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 394: The Analysis of Binary Responses from Toxicological Experiments Involving Reproduction and Teratogenicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2529820
The paper
Williams, D. A. (1975). 394: The Analysis of Binary Responses from Toxicological Experiments Involving Reproduction and Teratogenicity. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529820

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.