The role of grapheme–phoneme correspondence in the perception of words
Abstract
Eleanor J. Gibson, Anne Pick, Harry Osser, Marcia Hammond, The Role of Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondence in the Perception of Words, The American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 4 (Dec., 1962), pp. 554-570
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhanced abilities to perceive well-structured letter strings appear early in the reading process, but such effects are restricted to high-frequency words and do not generalize to novel strings until 10-13 years of age.
“Although enhanced abilities to perceive well-structured letter strings appear early in the reading process, such effects are restricted to high-frequency words and do not generalize to novel strings until 10-13 years of age [4] (although see [35]).”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [4]
Behavioral evidence on word perception supports the case for protracted development of perceptual expertise.
“Behavioral evidence on word perception supports the case for protracted development of perceptual expertise.”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus
McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00134-7 · Cited by 1,489 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gibson, E. J., Pick, A., Osser, H., & Hammond, M.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1962-12
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 554
- ISSN
- 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052819072
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 18 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- grapheme-phoneme correspondence, word perception, reading, phonological processing, word recognition
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Language, Perception, Reading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
