The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prose Comprehension beyond the Word
Abstract
When individuals read or listen to prose they try to understand what it means. This is quite obvious. However, the cognitive mechanisms that participate in prose comprehension are far from obvious. Even simple stories involve com plexities that have stymied many cognitive scientists. Why is prose comprehen sion so difficult to study? Perhaps because comprehension is guided by so many domains of knowledge. Perhaps because some critical mysteries of prose comprehension reside between the lines-in the mind of the comprehender. Ten years ago very few psychologists were willing to dig beyond the surface of explicit code in their studies of discourse processing. Tacit knowledge, world knowledge, inferences, and expectations were slippery notions that experimental psychologists managed to circumvent rather than understand. In many scientific circles it was taboo to investigate mechanisms and phenomena that are not directly governed by the physical stimulus. Fortunately, times have changed. Cognitive scientists are now vigorously exploring the puzzles of comprehension that lie beyond the word. The study of discourse processing is currently growing at a frenetic pace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 · Cited by 2,877
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x · Cited by 1,458
Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511894664 · Cited by 892
Self-citationHuman cognition in its social context.
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.3.322 · Cited by 708
Causal relatedness and importance of story events
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. L. (1985) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90048-8 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Omanson, R. C., & Graesser, A. C.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 336
- ISSN
- 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995776300
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prose Comprehension beyond the Word. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1422477
- The paper
- Omanson, R. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1982). Prose Comprehension beyond the Word. The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.