The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Perspective on America's Vanishing Streams
Abstract
The free-flowing nature of streams in the U.S. has been dramatically altered over the past century, especially through construction of dams. The Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) estimated a total of 5,200,000 km of streams in the contiguous 48 states, but only 2% (<100,000 km) have sufficient high quality features to be worthy of federal protection status. The future of this dwindling number of high-quality streams is in doubt as proponents of development compete with conservation interests. Hydropower projects are projected to be built well into the future with a large increase in small projects (55% more than in 1988) even though the total generating capacity of the U.S. would increase only 0.3%. On the other hand, conservation efforts have resulted in increasing levels of federal protection of streams since the 1960s. "National River" or "Wild and Scenic River" status now provides protection for almost 16,000 km of streams, but only about 10% are found east of the Mississippi River. Analysis of the NRI database showed that the greatest quantity and density of high-quality streams are found in the south-Atlantic states, where streams have the least protection. The greatest number of NRI streams are found in the Coastal Plain and Central Lowland physiographic provinces. The NRI analysis showed only 42 high-quality, free-flowing (no major dams) rivers >200 km remaining in the 48 contiguous states. With continuing threats of exploitation, major conservation efforts are required to preserve these last free-flowing streams.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world
Malmqvist, B., & Rundle, S. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892902000097 · Cited by 1,047
What is hydrologic connectivity and why is it ecologically important?
Pringle, C. (2003) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.5145 · Cited by 666
Large-scale impacts of hydroelectric development
Rosenberg, D. M., Berkes, F., Bodaly, R. A., Hecky, R. E., Kelly, C. A., & Rudd, J. W. (1997) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a97-001 · Cited by 282
Macroecology of a host‐parasite relationship
Vaughn, C. C., & Taylor, C. M. (2000) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00256.x · Cited by 171
Rice, J., & Westerhoff, P. (2017) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2984 · Cited by 167
Fish Community Response to a Small‐Stream Dam Removal in a Maine Coastal River Tributary
Hogg, R. S., Coghlan, S. M., Zydlewski, J., & Gardner, C. (2015) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1080/00028487.2015.1007164 · Cited by 56
Moore, J. F., Pine, W. E., Frederick, P. C., Beck, S., Moreno, M., Dodrill, M. J., Boone, M., Sturmer, L., & Yurek, S. (2020) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1002/mcf2.10117 · Cited by 29
Mattson, R. A. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02692228 · Cited by 25
Ecosystem management and the conservation of river–floodplain systems
Hale, B. W., & Adams, M. S. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.05.002 · Cited by 21
Reservoir ecosystems support large pools of fish biomass
Parisek, C. A., De Castro, F. A., Colby, J. D., Leidy, G. R., Sadro, S., & Rypel, A. L. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59730-z · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Benke, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the North American Benthological Society
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-88
- ISSN
- 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2325752002
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.